|
|
|
|
#1
06-09-2011, 11:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I don't think anybody here is saying that RoF is better guys..
I still have faith that Luthier and co will get things right in the end, but check out how thorough and clear the roadmap is on the patches and what not. I'm sure that the RoF example is a precious testbed for the guys at Maddox, and still we're talking about two different but somehow similar products. 
|
|
#2
06-09-2011, 11:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
06-09-2011, 06:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Currently, yes. But I think we need to give Luthier and his team credit for their abilities. It's going to take time for CoD to fulfill its potential, but I have every faith that at some stage it will do just that. If you look at the initial release version and the current patch version, they've already acomplished a lot. I would hope that given time, both RoF and CoD will both be seen as truly great flight sims. I don't think CoD will be better than RoF at any stage...... But I do think it will be as good without doubt. I will admit, I prefer RoF. But that is simply my personal preference.
|
|
#4
06-10-2011, 08:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I hope CoD will get as far as RoF already did. Both sims are not competing against each other (WW1 - WW2). But at the moment I can only fly RoF without stutters and bugs.
BTW, what me disappointed most with CoD: the arcade style take offs and landings. When this is adressed, I will surely looking forward to fly traffic patterns at least 
Last edited by lion737; 06-10-2011 at 08:43 AM.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
