![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Which means that running with the slider at 50% has no real effect, you can take-off just fine with it at 100% and save yourself some trouble As for the temperatures now, i too had a bit of trouble. I could take-off just fine with an accelerated warm-up if i'm not carrying bombs, i would advance the throttles in a series of steps with the brakes on in order to "force" a temp increase. When they are running rough the aircraft shakes, when the shaking stops you know it's sufficiently warmed up for the current boost setting so you push it up a notch or two. However, i would only get the CHT (cylinder head temp) to 150 or so and upon trying to take-off with a bombload bad things would happen. If its unloaded you get enough acceleration and rudder authority even with the engines running slightly rough, but if it's loaded the acceleration is slower, airflow is less and engine components start to fail. My most recent trick is frequent use of the cowl flaps to actively control CHT. This is also really critical during descent and approach/landing. You can't just chop the throttle and start descending at high speed, the engines will go cold and by the time you deploy gear and flaps and need the extra power for the flare and touchdown you don't get any. In fact, the entire profile of the approach (how low can you set boost and how fast you can go in combination with your cowl flaps and prop pitch setting) is determined by keeping the temps where they need to be. If you just put the nose down at coarse pitch (which will cause you to accelerate even further) and chop the throttle you're about to suffer. Instead, chop the throttles first and go to fine pitch (high RPM), this combination makes the props windmill almost face-on to the incoming airflow and acts like an airbrake. Then start closing cowl flaps (i had them at about 30%-40% and it was still resulting in too low CHT), but remember to open them again when you re-apply throttle to settle into the glide slope. Yes, it's difficult and the ergonomics in the cockpit are not really the best, but it's highly realistic. Similar things happen with most radial engines, you can take a look on youtube at the A2A P-47 for FSX, or even better, search for some videos showing DeHavilland Beaver aircraft in Canada or Alaska starting up their wasp junior engine. Radials need some pretty intensive temp management, this workload is the trade-off for their reliability, power and combat resilience. |
|
|