Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > CoD Multiplayer

CoD Multiplayer Everything about multiplayer in IL-2 CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2011, 10:54 AM
609_Huetz 609_Huetz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 109
Default

I wonder what that "poor-red" fuzz is all about. The Spitfire is an outstanding fighter in this sim. I fly red mostly (some rare trips in a 109 included though) and I can't really complain. I have died online maybe twice or three times in accidents, yet I still have to be shot down by a 109 or a 110. That is after more than 6 weeks multiplayer.

It's much the same with the 109, if you work for your advantages, there's really nothing that can (and should) touch you.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-10-2011, 03:53 PM
Buzpilot Buzpilot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 609_Huetz View Post
I wonder what that "poor-red" fuzz is all about. The Spitfire is an outstanding fighter in this sim. I fly red mostly (some rare trips in a 109 included though) and I can't really complain. I have died online maybe twice or three times in accidents, yet I still have to be shot down by a 109 or a 110. That is after more than 6 weeks multiplayer.

It's much the same with the 109, if you work for your advantages, there's really nothing that can (and should) touch you.
Thats what i mean, just because ppl can't handle the 109 advantages, they "feel" it's underpowered, and disable the SpitMkIIa.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-11-2011, 08:41 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buzpilot View Post
Thats what i mean, just because ppl can't handle the 109 advantages, they "feel" it's underpowered, and disable the SpitMkIIa.
Like i said before, people disallow the Mk.IIa because it's currently the only fighter that's getting correct performance. Everything else is slower than it should, 109s, Hurricanes, the whole lot.

Running a server with the Mk.IIa would probably result in 80% of the server population cruising around in one, it gets boring pretty fast if you have nothing to shoot at
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2011, 09:15 PM
whoarmongar whoarmongar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 265
Default

I sugest you dont fly a spit online join the other 70% of online players who fly 109s. Its faster climbs better dives better and is more powerfully armed. this allied to the fact that lots of servers ban the MkII, and flying the Mk1 is like driving a car with only 1st and 4th gear.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-04-2011, 12:32 PM
flyingblind flyingblind is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 255
Default

Google 'Battle of Britain: The real story'. It's quite an interesting BBC documentary on BoB with actual pilot accounts and appraisels of the planes, tactics and weapons as well as an indepth look at what when on behind the scenes at a logistical and tactical level. This part in particular highlighted the fact that it wasn't the Spitfire being a better plane that won the battle but the way in which it was used and the backup behind it. That and some crass blunders by Goering.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-04-2011, 12:57 PM
41Sqn_Stormcrow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, what I hope for is that they fix the FMs to finally get historic performance, the Spit 2a being apparently the only one getting correct performance. So I guess we should rather focus on what performance the planes should be instead of focussing how wrong in comparison they are, because we already know that they are wrong.

In doing so we should look at each plane separately and not comparing. Ideally when putting the correct data into game for each plane we will end up with correct relative performance.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-04-2011, 04:31 PM
609_Huetz 609_Huetz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Stormcrow View Post
Well, what I hope for is that they fix the FMs to finally get historic performance, the Spit 2a being apparently the only one getting correct performance. So I guess we should rather focus on what performance the planes should be instead of focussing how wrong in comparison they are, because we already know that they are wrong.

In doing so we should look at each plane separately and not comparing. Ideally when putting the correct data into game for each plane we will end up with correct relative performance.
This.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-04-2011, 06:22 PM
Orpheus Orpheus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 235
Default

On a sort-of related note, has anyone noticed that the Spitfire fuel gauges never seem to move? In all other planes, after flying for a while you can see the fuel decrease... but in the spit, I always seem to land with a full tank?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-04-2011, 06:44 PM
609_Huetz 609_Huetz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orpheus View Post
On a sort-of related note, has anyone noticed that the Spitfire fuel gauges never seem to move? In all other planes, after flying for a while you can see the fuel decrease... but in the spit, I always seem to land with a full tank?
That's because the needle on displays a part of the fuel you actually have on board. If you take her for a spin at i.e. 50% you will notice quite a bit of movement.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.