Cliffs of Dover Video Thread V1.0 [Closed]

[JG14_Jagr]

Originally Posted by Les

From the quick search I did, the biggest raid on London involved about a thousand German planes (400 bombers and 700 fighters), but I don't know how spread out they would have been in space and time, or how many British fighters met them, so to recreate something like that in a video made using 'Cliffs of Dover' could indeed just require using a couple of hundred planes, which is do-able now.

This is a reference about Allied raids..but can be used as a comparison...

Some of the largest raids employed 1000 bombers to strike targets in Germany. This bomber stream could be as long as 100 miles (161 km) and as wide as 1 mile (1.61 km). At 180 mph (290 km/h) over the target an air raid could last from 35-45 minutes.

[DoolittleRaider]

With regard to numbers of aircraft needed to be seen in a COD mission emulating raids of the Battle of Britain time frame, I should think that no more than a couple of hundred would suffice. If the Luftwaffe flew a maximum of 1500 "sorties" on some 'maximum effort' days across the breadth of southeast England against geographically separated targets, and over a duration of several hours, clearly no more than a few hundred would be at any specific location-in-space and time.

The USAAF attacks on Germany in 44 and 45 did number in excess of 1000 bombers, and perhaps an equal or larger number of fighters, but that stream of bombers and escorting fighters would likewise have been spread out in time-and-space. Thus, again, even an emulation of an air battle over Germany in '45 would not require more than a few hundred aircraft to be 'spawned' in a COD game/flightsim at any one point in time.

Therefore, I think that the investigation into 'smoothness' of the simulation in handling 1600+ simultaneous aircraft is interesting only in theoreticals. Of course, if it can be shown (tweaked) that such a massive number of aircraft can be generated smoothly, that bodes very well for extremely smooth, non-stuttering air battles of a realistic 300 aircraft or so.

imho

[Les]

Originally Posted by DoolittleRaider

With regard to numbers of aircraft needed to be seen in a COD mission emulating raids of the Battle of Britain time frame, I should think that no more than a couple of hundred would suffice. If the Luftwaffe flew a maximum of 1500 "sorties" on some 'maximum effort' days across the breadth of southeast England against geographically separated targets, and over a duration of several hours, clearly no more than a few hundred would be at any specific location-in-space and time.

The USAAF attacks on Germany in 44 and 45 did number in excess of 1000 bombers, and perhaps an equal or larger number of fighters, but that stream of bombers and escorting fighters would likewise have been spread out in time-and-space. Thus, again, even an emulation of an air battle over Germany in '45 would not require more than a few hundred aircraft to be 'spawned' in a COD game/flightsim at any one point in time.

Therefore, I think that the investigation into 'smoothness' of the simulation in handling 1600+ simultaneous aircraft is interesting only in theoreticals. Of course, if it can be shown (tweaked) that such a massive number of aircraft can be generated smoothly, that bodes very well for extremely smooth, non-stuttering air battles of a realistic 300 aircraft or so.

imho

Definitely entering into the theoretical realm at this point, well beyond anything that could be considered realistic.

I could be wrong, but from what I've already seen I don't think the game engine itself will have a problem rendering several hundred aircraft at once, at playable frame-rates, when the hardware is capable of doing so.

And in the meantime, right now, purely in terms of numbers of planes, video's can be made, using the current game, with enough aircraft in them to recreate anything that actually happened during the Battle of Britain. Whether anyone has the skills and commitment to work around the game's other limits and actually do that is another thing.

[louisv]

Vids...

[ATAG_Doc]

Video of my intercept that goes horribly wrong.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSagYRb4Dwk

[ATAG_Doc]

Another

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqQ-te8R-aU

[louisv]

Just love those videos

[303_Tees]

Originally Posted by timej31

Another

Hey You dont use ruder ??

[Les]

Originally Posted by JG14_Jagr

This is a reference about Allied raids..but can be used as a comparison...

Some of the largest raids employed 1000 bombers to strike targets in Germany. This bomber stream could be as long as 100 miles (161 km) and as wide as 1 mile (1.61 km). At 180 mph (290 km/h) over the target an air raid could last from 35-45 minutes.

Hmmmm, tempting. And with the right choice of shots it could even be watchable, if not jaw-dropping. But without the kind of planes that were actually involved, able to fly at the right altitude, over the right kind of locations, it would have to be a fantasy scenario at the moment, and would take a lot of effort to do even then. Too much for me to do in any case, but it certainly gets the imagination going.