CoD vs some other sims that model Kent?

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Houndstone Hawk

@ David Hayward

But your pics highlight beautifully the very point that is painstakingly trying to be put across to you. The fact that the trees are so isolated & apart gives it an extremely un-uk feel, more akin to the mediterranean etc.

It does nothing of the sort. The CoD screenshot is virtually identical to the photo. The CoD "isolated trees" are blind WoP fanboyism. The same "isolated trees" exist in the WoP shot.

yes but its the branches dave, look you cant ignore it lol cos its true. Go outside your house and look at how the trees braches knit with trees close together creating a dense look, no how do you think its gonna look at height?

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by BigPickle

yes but its the branches dave, look you cant ignore it lol cos its true. Go outside your house and look at how the trees braches knit with trees close together creating a dense look, no how do you think its gonna look at height?

Are you now complaining that CoD trees don't have enough branches?

Look, I have had enough. The post with the WoP screenshot, CoD screenshot, and actual photo pretty much says it all. If you expect the CoD devs to make that game look more like WoP in any way, you are not going to be happy. WoP looks like crap. If you like it, that's great, but anyone looking at that post realizes immediately that CoD is closer to the real photo. If you are counting tree branches, then you are just desperate, and there is no point to responding to you. If you have any other points you'd like to make, just look at page 47 of this thread. It is my response to anything further you have to say on this subject.

Originally Posted by David Hayward

Are you now complaining that CoD trees don't have enough branches?

Look, I have had enough. The post with the WoP screenshot, CoD screenshot, and actual photo pretty much says it all. If you expect the CoD devs to make that game look more like WoP in any way, you are not going to be happy. WoP looks like crap. If you like it, that's great, but anyone looking at that post realizes immediately that CoD is closer to the real photo. If you are counting tree branches, then you are just desperate, and there is no point to responding to you. If you have any other points you'd like to make, just look at page 47 of this thread. It is my response to anything further you have to say on this subject.

No dave im not complaining about about trees not having enough branches, your complaining about me thinking thats what I'm saying.
I'm saying that the trees are two sparcely placed so increase the branches or place them closer together to make it look more dense.

Oh and nearly forgot :

Do you actually think I care if you ignore me? That's pretty funny

As quoted by you.

Nice, you ignorant little sh*t.

As quoted by Alan Partridge

[David Hayward]

Page 47.

[philip.ed]

OK David, that's fine. I mean, you really are in a minority here. It's clear in the CoD pictures that there is a lack of hedgerows, there are too many randomly placed trees than is necessary, and also the trees should be neatly arranged in patches of wood-land and forest.

WoP models the neat look of the countryside very well. COlours and such are another matter entirely.

Cod models the fields and colours nicely (maybe the textures could be slightly better in quality).

That's all from me. I mean, personally, I wouldn't ask an American to explain my country, so really your posts don't hold a lot of water to me. I'm not being rude, just honest.

[Dano]

Originally Posted by philip.ed

OK David, that's fine. I mean, you really are in a minority here. It's clear in the CoD pictures that there is a lack of hedgerows, there are too many randomly placed trees than is necessary, and also the trees should be neatly arranged in patches of wood-land and forest.

WoP models the neat look of the countryside very well. COlours and such are another matter entirely.

Cod models the fields and colours nicely (maybe the textures could be slightly better in quality).

Spot on in my opinion, and out of the two I prefer the look of CoD by a long way.

[Sauf]

I think with all our expectations being raised over time that we do forget it is primarly a COMBAT sim, which it does exceptionally well, if we can get smooth game/flight play I can live with whatever the ground looks like tbh.

[SsSsSsSsSnake]

Originally Posted by Sauf

I think with all our expectations being raised over time that we do forget it is primarly a COMBAT sim, which it does exceptionally well, if we can get smooth game/flight play I can live with whatever the ground looks like tbh.

Like WOP?

[Sauf]

Hi Snake, and no offense intended, but I have flown with online squads using only full real, on and off for the last 5 years of il2, I did buy WOP after a break from flying (working away from home for 16 months on and off) as I thought a change would be good, Played it for half a day and never looked at it since, something I would give my 9 year old boy to play with to teach him the basics of flight dynamics. Also downloaded ROF demo and gave that a shot but couldnt get into it, though that may have been more to the limited game play with the demo than the game itself. Way things are going might have to try it again.

PS, will gladly meet up with you online one day mate to have a fly around as your wingman, you can show me the sights of Kent. S`