CoD vs some other sims that model Kent?

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by philip.ed

David, for the last time, people in England (I'll put this in caps just so you take note) ARE EXPLAINING TO YOU THE FACT THAT COD HAS A DISTINCT LACK OF:
-CLOSE TREE SPACINGS
-HEDGEROWS
-DARKERS TREES WHICH IS WHAT WOULD BE SEEN FROM ALTITUDE (OR, INDEED, ANY DISTANCES)

Philip, I hate to break it to you, but you do not speak for all the people in England. I have seen plenty of people from England who think that CoD does a pretty good job of simulating England's landscape.

And your clams that WoPuke does a better job are utterly ridiculous because YOU HAVE NO F-ING SCREENSHOTS WHICH SUPPORT YOUR VIEWS. IF WINGS OF PUKE DID A BETTER JOB YOU WOULD POST SCREENSHOTS WHICH SUPPORT THAT CLAIM. YOU HAVEN'T, SO PLEASE STOP PRETENDING THAT IT IS AN ACCEPTED FACT. IT ISN'T.

[philip.ed]

How's this for you:
nice and neat layout, just like in the photos posted before hand.
It's far from an absolutely perfect representation, but it's a damn site better than CoD. And that is the opinion of both an English person, and someone who has compared these shots to photos. Show me a picture of CoD with a border layout of fields and trees similar to England....you won't find one.

I'm only advocating layouts here, just to say, not colours. And similar pictures of WoP have been posted in this thread...

Oh, and would those English people who mention, please stand up?

I mean, if this won't cinvince you, I'm wasting my time. because I'm not slamming CoD, just saying that it is far from perfect.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by philip.ed

How's this for you:

Other than the fact that it looks like complete shit, what about it?

[Houndstone Hawk]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

Philip, I hate to break it to you, but you do not speak for all the people in England. I have seen plenty of people from England who think that CoD does a pretty good job of simulating England's landscape.

And your clams that WoPuke does a better job are utterly ridiculous because YOU HAVE NO F-ING SCREENSHOTS WHICH SUPPORT YOUR VIEWS. IF WINGS OF PUKE DID A BETTER JOB YOU WOULD POST SCREENSHOTS WHICH SUPPORT THAT CLAIM. YOU HAVEN'T, SO PLEASE STOP PRETENDING THAT IT IS AN ACCEPTED FACT. IT ISN'T.

Wings of Puke? Bloody hell mate how old are you?

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Houndstone Hawk

Wings of Puke? Bloody hell mate how old are you?

47

[Houndstone Hawk]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

47

Wings of Prey ... Better than COD visually but only that. COD far supercedes it in all other areas as an overall experience (WOP has little to no immersion qualities atall) & yes, speaking as a Brit, COD doesn't do a particularly great job at portraying the realism of the South Eastern English environment.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJ73F...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_dtw6I_M20

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qdv485Vnah4

[philip.ed]

OK, new picture added (from the demo)
And please, be analytical in your answers. You wouldn't get an E grade in a history essay by saying 'it's shit.'

[kristorf]

Originally Posted by philip.ed

You wouldn't get an E grade in a history essay by saying 'it's shit.'

Owwwwwwww

[philip.ed]

I think this is what I meant. Colours are rather pathetic at showing summer-time Britain. But all of that aside, the layout is a lot closer to England that CoD...

[David Hayward]

It isn't even a close call. The WoP screenshot looks like garbage. The CoD shot looks like the photo. WoP may have more trees, but that doesn't make it look more like the landscape in the photo.

Seriously, it is not possible to look at those 3 shots and not say that WoP looks more real unless you are on the graphic arts staff for WoP, and even they would probably admit that CoD looks better.