Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-29-2011, 06:18 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kano_Magnus View Post
a landscape I am somewhat familiar with
Not as familiar with it as Blackbusheflyer, apparently
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-29-2011, 06:47 PM
Kano_Magnus Kano_Magnus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Not as familiar with it as Blackbusheflyer, apparently
Hardly, if my perception changes that dramatically in the coming years I'm going to assume I have cataracts. Dude could be lying about his credentials to 'win' for all you know, this is the internet after all.

Oh btw "David Hayward" try not to "make hay" (do you see?) out of other people's arguments when you lost your own, not a good look.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackbusheFlyer View Post
Looks good to me, I still hold a class 1 medical so have reasonable faith in my AME's judgement that I am of sound mind and eyesight. I think we should at this point agree to disagree.
Well if Dr Riviera has signed you off how can I disagree. I would caution though if that looks OK then perhaps you should take care when approaching traffic lights?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Friendly_flyer View Post
Actually, looking at vegetation from abowe is not the same as looking at it from ground level. I've flown quite a bit, and being a landscape ecologist I usually take the oportunity to study landscapes from the plane window.
I have been in a plane one or two times, yeah? Looking through the window isn't like looking through a kaleidoscope. Landscape ecologist? You mean a gardener?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2011, 06:51 PM
BigPickle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

lol prolly gonna get spanked for this but i actually liked the desaturated feel to WoP, gave it a nice WW2 feel i thought.

Oh by the way anyone played with GAPA with CoD yet? just a hint
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2011, 06:55 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kano_Magnus View Post
Oh btw "David Hayward" try not to "make hay" (do you see?) out of other people's arguments when you lost your own, not a good look.
The only place I lost anything is in your imagination. The game looks ok to me. I'm happy. You're not happy. I win!

I might even be happy if they change the game to look more like you think it should look. As long as it isn't puke green, I still win!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:04 PM
SsSsSsSsSnake SsSsSsSsSnake is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: England
Posts: 288
Default

I play WOP.IL21946 and COD,i prefer the look of WOP(I didnt like the green when i 1st played it and found turning the brightness up made it look very good for me.I like the look of modded IL2'46 the colours are nice on the eyes,when I 1st saw COD it dissapointed me because it looked to bright green,I love the COD water,cockpits and damage stuff but as much as i want to like the terrain after 4 weeks it still doesnt look right to me.but I guess its all subjective.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-29-2011, 06:59 PM
BlackbusheFlyer BlackbusheFlyer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kano_Magnus View Post
Hardly, if my perception changes that dramatically in the coming years I'm going to assume I have cataracts. Dude could be lying about his credentials to 'win' for all you know, this is the internet after all.

Oh btw "David Hayward" try not to "make hay" (do you see?) out of other people's arguments when you lost your own, not a good look.



Well if Dr Riviera has signed you off how can I disagree. I would caution though if that looks OK then perhaps you should take care when approaching traffic lights?



I have been in a plane one or two times, yeah? Looking through the window isn't like looking through a kaleidoscope. Landscape ecologist? You mean a gardener?
Making asinine remarks about people who disagree with your opinion I suggest is also not a 'good look' and conducting an argument from a position of experience is surely advisable, less one be deemed foolish?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:12 PM
Kano_Magnus Kano_Magnus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
The only place I lost anything is in your imagination. The game looks ok to me. I'm happy. You're not happy. I win!

I might even be happy if they change the game to look more like you think it should look. As long as it isn't puke green, I still win!
You had a shitfit over something I didn't actually post. You are an idiot and I suspect someone in possession of an autistic spectrum disorder. You don't even own the game!

YOU ARE WRONG, AN IDIOT AND SOMEONE WHO OBSESSES OVER A GAME HE DOESN'T EVEN OWN. GET PROFESSIONAL HELP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackbusheFlyer View Post
Making asinine remarks about people who disagree with your opinion I suggest is also not a 'good look' and conducting an argument from a position of experience is surely advisable, less one be deemed foolish?
Whoa there Methuselah, I *am* arguing from experience, certain people chose to duck the point. Life-long resident here guys!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-29-2011, 07:19 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kano_Magnus View Post
YOU ARE WRONG, AN IDIOT AND SOMEONE WHO OBSESSES OVER A GAME HE DOESN'T EVEN OWN. GET PROFESSIONAL HELP.
I'm happy about the look of the game. You're whining about it. I think it's great that you see that as a win for you. Congrats on your win!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-01-2011, 02:53 AM
Skiiwa Skiiwa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 88
Default

There are some great pics in this thread! Keep it going please I play all the games in this thread and like each one for what it is.....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-01-2011, 05:50 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Big-Pickle: aye, I remember there being some comment regarding hedgerows, but then again, a lot of things were said in those development threads.
The team must have a massive list of features which can be added or improved, and rumours are that many features are there, but haven't been completed by the team for inclusion in the sim....(or are there, but haven't been unlocked yet)

ideally, development would be thus:
-bugs are fixed so the game is nice and smooth
-features are improved
-the team announces new features, or present features which have been drastically changed e.g a new weather system, with realistic clouds (yes Dutch! the clouds are rather poor afterall )

-once the game has been improved to a level where it is rather awesome, tools can then be sent out to the community for an administered modding effort, or a community modding effort which won't affect online play (with the banning system in place, a modding community like SAS could propser nicely).

hopefully this would enable the game to work it's way to becoming a stand-out BoB simulator.

a man can dream
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.