Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: What should be IL2: CoD's primary focus?
Cliffs of Dover should focus on realism 250 95.06%
Cliffs of Dover should focus on accesibility 13 4.94%
Voters: 263. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-18-2011, 02:00 PM
SG1_Lud's Avatar
SG1_Lud SG1_Lud is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Retaliator View Post
I wonder who's the brave one that voted Accessibility ... lol

lmao, must be one of the devs who wants to go on Holidays!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-18-2011, 02:08 PM
ChrisDNT ChrisDNT is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 298
Default

I voted of course for realism.

But, in fact, this discussion should not even exist, as there is always the option.... for options in the game setup.

But the problem is that the "kikools", who think they're the best, cannot simply stand the fact of not flying with all the "realism" options enabled, even if it is not realistic at all, because of their ego.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-18-2011, 02:39 PM
JG14_Jagr JG14_Jagr is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 433
Default

I vote for Scalability.. I want the game to be commercial success first and for emost. That will drive future funding and development. FM's and performance online I want the server to be able to make sure everyone is on a level playing field..but if customer XYZ wants to play in arcade mode offline or on an arcade mode server and that allows thousands or tens of thousands in more sales then I'm all for adding those options to the realism panel.. I won't use them, but I don't mind them being there.
__________________
MSI P67A-65D
Intel i5 2500K @ 4.2 Gig
8 Gigs Corsair DDR3 1600 RAM
XFX 6970 Video Card
Win7 64 Bit Home Ed
ATI 12.3 Driver Package
WD Caviar 7600 RPM HDD
ATI CCC at DEFAULT settings
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-18-2011, 06:53 PM
MikkOwl MikkOwl is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 309
Default

1. Realism is the default. A benchmark.
2. Lack of understanding of what real is, is met with explanation and education.
3. Accessability is the process of permitting the option of disabling or simplifying aspects of realism which is complicated, difficult or just inconvinient.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-18-2011, 07:21 PM
Rote Dreizehn Rote Dreizehn is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12
Default

from my Side:

this Simulator must be fully realism. For me its very import that you can fly your
Plane truly as it was in 1941 (Technical/Physikal). Realism is the only Reason
that i am using this IL2 Series. Accessibility should be only how it be in real life as
Pilot.

By the Way:
I think Luthier will do his best, to bring IL2 Cod to the next Simulator Level.
Also will pay small prices if they need for continuing Developing to supply the
Developers
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-18-2011, 07:39 PM
Robotic Pope's Avatar
Robotic Pope Robotic Pope is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hertfordshire,England,UK
Posts: 1,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikkOwl View Post
1. Realism is the default. A benchmark.
2. Lack of understanding of what real is, is met with explanation and education.
3. Accessability is the process of permitting the option of disabling or simplifying aspects of realism which is complicated, difficult or just inconvinient.
This was my understanding of the meaning of accessability and why I voted for it. Everyone should have the option to taylor the game to their liking whether that is fully realistic or not.

I think a lot of people have thought of accessability in meaning forcing on all players the opposite of realism to make it easier.
__________________


XBL GT: - Robotic Pope
HyperLobby CS: - Robot_Pope
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-18-2011, 08:42 PM
TUCKIE_JG52 TUCKIE_JG52 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 250
Default

Let's back to mechanical tachometers and realism settings!

Now that they modelled both mechanical and electricl, they can set an easy instrument mode and a realism instrument modes... there's room for all...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-18-2011, 10:38 PM
SG1_Gunkan SG1_Gunkan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Spain
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUCKIE_JG52 View Post
Let's back to mechanical tachometers and realism settings!

Now that they modelled both mechanical and electricl, they can set an easy instrument mode and a realism instrument modes... there's room for all...
+1
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-18-2011, 11:55 PM
15JG52_Brauer 15JG52_Brauer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SG1_Gunkan View Post
+1
Ditto - We've all been newbies (In fact often I feel I still am over the channel - especially in red planes!!) - so give them options - it also means the devs hard work on analogue dials does not go to waste - any maybe they can just dampen the flutter down - (at the same time as they fix our clod-hopping mixture problems - or if we are mishandling the engines somehow give us some clues .Though the fact that even when I jump into a free flight over the channel it bumps imediatley if I am not on full throttle does seem to indicate some other problem - but thats off topic - sorry).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-19-2011, 12:13 AM
SEE SEE is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,678
Default

realism? Would that include restrictions on rear view ability even when loosening shoulder straps. Heads on swivels?

Lets face it, 6DOF, mouse lookaround and check yer six POV hat assignments are equally unrealistic with little penalty for being 'unstrapped' in combat even in full switch!

Just wondering how far people would be prepared to go or do they have a cut off point? In which case the arguments 'for and against' are not quite so black and white!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.