Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-15-2011, 06:40 PM
Viper2000 Viper2000 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 218
Cool

I'm quite sure that we'll end up with a realistic sim because that's what the majority of the vocal section of the community wants (obviously there are probably quite a lot of people who have bought the sim but don't post and so nobody really knows what they want...).

Provided that people keep posting data, which they will, the chances are that things will progressively get fixed over time.

OTOH, I suspect that quite a lot of what's going on at the moment is about quick, pragmatic fixes rather than for example trying to get the perfect tachometer in one go.

I would imagine that switching the tacho type to electric is just a quicker way of reducing bounce than rewriting the mechanical tacho code.

I would also point out that stuff like instrument behaviour is very technical and quite specific. AFAIK some of the compass parameters we have are currently taken from Russian compasses of the period, presumably because it's easier to get a WWII Russian compass in Russia than to get a WWII British or German compass.

It's therefore quite possible that the mechanical tacho model might be based on Russian instruments of the period rather than British ones, resulting in different behaviour despite the fact that the mode of operation is nominally the same. So we might get more realistic instrument behaviour post-patch, even if the drive mechanism is wrong (which I suppose might impact the DM).

As for the carburettor stuff, it's complicated, as the 10 page thread on the subject attests. I suspect that again, the behaviour mentioned in the beta patch readme is a pragmatic quick fix rather than the last word on the subject.

So at this point I'm probably more relaxed than the average person here; I'm in this for the long haul, and view the next few months as more of a large scale public beta than anything else. We'll get there in the end.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.