![]() |
|
Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How do you set res for window?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
just alt tab, and resize the window with your mouse !
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I tried running COD at 1024x768. Looks and playes amazing. Too bad I need a microfying glass to see whats happening.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Memory (on graphic card) is in direct relationship with resolution. Higher resolution, more memory. And since in game is graphic memory problem for cards with 1GB and lower ...
Last edited by mcmatt; 04-07-2011 at 09:34 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I´ve always downloaded drivers from nVidia.com, no exception this time - made sure I had the latest drivers for my Geforce 330 before installing CoD.
The game was still unplayable on my i5 3,2 GHz with 6 GB RAM, 1 Gb 330. A couple of days ago I was just fooling around, and for some reason I though why not chech for updates via Device Manager in Control Panel. Not sure where Windows finds these updates, but it did find something, and obviously not from nvidia.com. Downloaded a rather big update, and now I can actually - to a certain degree - play the game at medium settings. I´ve also noticed increased FPS in windowed mode, but the game crashes to desktop every single time I try ![]() Anyway, just an idea for those of you with geforce cards, perhaps the nvidia-drivers aren´t optimal for this game for some reason. Cheers -Michael |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I run it in Window on 1280x800 with an outdated P4 ; enough for a quick play or testing. but i noticed a huge fps drop from outside view (30-50fps!) to inside the cockpit (only 15-22fps)....and fps didn´t increase on reargunnerposition or looking straight to the sky without any cockpitstructure insight. any idea or solution for that behaviour ?? could be the immense Pilot or Gunner textures (4mb ?) the reason...loaded still in background ??? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you have a mid to high range PC then playing at 1920x1080 should not be a problem. I can run it pretty well except when flying over London, there the FPS is still playable but I wouldnt want to dogfight like that.
I have to disagree with the statement some make about not needing AA in a game if you set the resolution high enough. Even at 1920x1080 there are still alot of jagged edges especially on aircraft at medium/long distance. Personally if I see jaggies in my games I feel that I've just wasted alot of money on a PC and might as well just play on an XBOX...4x AA is a must for me. Anistropic filtering is nice, but the effects of this arent as noticable as AA is and I can live with that on 4x or even off if it has some performance gains. AA doesnt seem to work with CoD right now so there is no choice but to deal with it. Alot of the people complaining about FPS on these forums seem to have really dated hardware and I have no sympathy for that, get a job, make some money and keep your system up to date if you want to play the latest games with the eye candy on. However, there are also alot of reports of low FPS on high end systems as well so hardware cannot be entirely to blame here. Considering how many things are actually broken in this sim I am not surprised at all to find it poorly optimized. This is the way of the industry it now seems. For me the game is very playable on all medium settings, with high model and damage decal settings. My specs, while not killer, are mid range. Gigabyte 790XTA-UD4 Motherboard AMD Phenom2 965 BE Quad@3.6ghz 8GB ADATA gaming series RAM@1333 CL9 ATI 5770 Vid card by Asus 1000W bronze PSU Asetek 120mm Liquid CPU cooler Push/pull AZZA Solano Full tower w/9 fans including Kingston RAM cooler Some Green, Red and Blue LED lights to make everything pretty |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
“Violent, irrational, intolerant, allied to racism and tribalism and bigotry, invested in ignorance and hostile to free inquiry, contemptuous of women and coercive toward children: organized religion ought to have a great deal on its conscience.” ― Christopher Hitchens |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() I have exactly the opposite: lower fps external view (above ground) than inside. The only thing could imagine in your case is that your card has too little VRAM and it gets overloaded by the graphics in the cockpit. Maybe if you press F10 to disable the interactive cocpit your fps will pick up (just a thought). ~S~ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
109 cockpit 23-25.....Hurri cockpit 20-23 and the worst is 110 with 17-22 click on Outside view with 6 or more planes rapidly goes up to 40-50 over the nice sea! but why the heck does fps in cockpit didnt increase even if im looking straight to heaven....??? i think something is bad programmed. sure outside over a city its still slide show for me (5-10fps) since last patch load much more or alle groundobjects; number of groundobjects in video options doesnt care about that anymore....after first patch it was better (less objects). got a HIS HD 4670 with 512mb (128bit) old AGP slot and runs pretty good without any graphic mistakes here...mainbord and P4 are the bottleneck; old 2GB DDR 333 Ram on xp+sp3 and DX9c but stable as hell...and clean. so pls let me know if there are some "news" about huge fps differences between out and insight view or the immense fps drop in cockpit. Last edited by kubanskiloewe; 04-20-2011 at 05:18 PM. |
![]() |
|
|