For legal reasons I could understand the filter being enabled by default. The user would then have to make a conscious decision to disable the filter. Surely then all liability is removed from the software as the end user has disabled the safety feature.
As I've posted previously, I have a member of my family who is epileptic (not photosensitive) and I'd fully support this option.
03-25-2011, 12:05 PM
Threaded Mode