Freetrack interface use in IL-2:CoD

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by albx

you are wrong, i'm not a "fanatic", i'm only answering W_R with his same words, perhaps he is a NP's fanatic, everytime we start to talk about this argument he begins to say "Tir is better","buy TIR","why don't you just get the real thing, instead of a sponge that offers less than optimal performance?" is this a sort of "TIR fanatic"?? or I'm again wrong?

Actually, I say - FT is a hack sooo, it looks like you're wrong.. it does offer less than optimal performance

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

And yes - I tested TiR products.

how could you have done that?

[albx]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

Actually, I say - FT is a hack sooo, it looks like you're wrong.. it does offer less than optimal performance




how could you have done that?

can you prove FT is an hack? give us the prove.... and a technical explanation why is TIR better than freetrack.

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by albx

can you prove FT is an hack? give us the prove.... and a technical explanation why is TIR better than freetrack.

read back through the threads, and you'll see



@ LoBi

with equal performance? yes, Lobi, that's because FT uses part of NP software

[albx]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

read back through the thread, and you'll see

you again are offending my intelligence and testing my patience... the words that you write about what YOU think are NOTHING, you have to PROVE what you say ok?

you edited after i wrote my answer...

WICH PART OF NP'S SOFTWARE DOES FT USE?

[Wolf_Rider]

@ albx

you've already done that

[albx]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

@ albx

you've already done that

your posts are so clear....

[Wolf_Rider]

@ albx...
so, who are you??

[sigur_ros]

Originally Posted by albx

WICH PART OF NP'S SOFTWARE DOES FT USE?

This part according to Wolf_Troll. This little source code from linux-track, another evil hacking project stealing from Naturalpoint.

[Wolf_Rider]

the LT looks hard

[albx]

Originally Posted by sigur_ros

This part according to Wolf_Troll. This little source code from linux-track, another evil hacking project stealing from Naturalpoint.

what he probably don't and will never understand is how it works. The software (the game) call some functions of a .dll, this .dll give back at the game the values X-Y-Z-yaw-pitch-roll. what freetrack do, when a software that don't use FT protocol, is to use a .dll with the same name of TIR's .dll, but are 2 completely different .dll. The game think is talking with NP's .dll and get the values back, but is freetrack, and no NP's .dll or software is involved in it. The complain that could only had NP was the string

sigdata = {
        "precise head tracking\n put your head into the game\n now go look around\n\n "
                "Copyright EyeControl Technologies",

        "hardware camera\n software processing data\n track user movement\n\n "
                "Copyright EyeControl Technologies"
};

that was removed, so can you again explain your statement?

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

@ LoBi
with equal performance? yes, Lobi, that's because FT uses part of NP software

thanks