Friday update and discussions 2011-03-04

[ECV56_Lancelot]

Originally Posted by LukeFF

I just wanna go one week without someone making yet another inane comparison with WoP.

Amen to that!

[addman]

Originally Posted by LukeFF

I just wanna go one week without someone making yet another inane comparison with WoP.

Here's a tip, don't log in on the forums for a week Seriously, I don't know why I'm still reading this thread. All I wanted was to see was Olegs update...oh! nice weather today, think I'll go out for a walk.

[T}{OR]

Originally Posted by lukeff

i just wanna go one week without someone making yet another inane comparison with wop.

+1000

[Sasha]

Originally Posted by LukeFF

I just wanna go one week without someone making yet another inane comparison with WoP.

OK... let's forget the mentioned game example... (far from my favorite)

So without it - Do You think that presented graphics achievements are impressive in March2011 ?

Or maybe clouds and land visuals are not important in video presentation of new generation flight sim, even combat one ?

Not heating up feelings... just interested in your simple answer.

[jt_medina]

Screens and the video look really nice. I can't wait to try it.

[Hunin]

Originally Posted by LukeFF

Except that it's not.



Temporary

Brevity can indeed be the soul of whit, but it need not be.

[Biggs]

no spitfire wallpaper?

oh well, the hurri will do just fine

great vids too!!!

[Sasha]

To be honnest, I am not really impressed... "Wings of pray" had better visuals of ground.

Generally, I was hoping for some last minute surprise in graphics of ground and clouds.
This is year 2011, so these visuals are OK... but not impressive.

I've been following screenshots updates for many, many months... I honestly can't see what is so new in these 2 videos - that we haven't seen so far in update screens ?

This is brand new project... and should look much better than moded "Il-2 1946" but, except dynamic lightning and cockpit graphics, it is not the case.

Simulation feeling will be great, Oleg is master, number 1 in that field... but I was expecting better, more realistic clouds and ground visuals...

Just my calm analyses... nothing more - nothing less...

( no need to start the third wolrd war by fan-boys... or forum "inquisition" cry: to ban the member who dared to analyse the presentation )

[Feuerfalke]

No worries. Everybody has his own preferences.

Oleg goes for realism.

Birds of Prey for fast lighthearted action with cinematic contrasts and effects.

As long as you don't claim BoP to look more realistic, IMHO that's just fine.



However, I prefer realism. That's why I prefer IL2:CoD over BoP any time.

[Sasha]

Originally Posted by Feuerfalke

However, I prefer realism. That's why I prefer IL2:CoD over BoP any time.

+1 I keep up with Oleg from the first release of Il-2 ...Just my expectations and hopes - were unrealisticaly high.