Freetrack interface use in IL-2:CoD

[Royraiden]

Originally Posted by swiss

Atm I can tell you 33% have both.

Based on what?There was another poll before?

[albx]

Originally Posted by Royraiden

Based on what?There was another poll before?

I suppose that when Swiss voted they where 3 votes against, Swiss have both FT and TIR so 33% is refered about itself, right?

[robtek]

This poll is so pointless....

Nobody can be against a improvement, except "sad sacks" maybe.

[julian265]

I'd prefer access to the six head control axes (like DCS:A-10C gives), rather than anything 'special' for FT. No vote from me.

[Wolf_Rider]

Swiss is right, there is no "don't care option". There aren't any options for any other tracker though, only a single selection.

poll could have used more thought

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Wolf_Rider

Swiss is right, there is no "don't care option". There aren't any options for any other tracker though, only a single selection.

poll could have used more thought

And because of that, you voted no.

Please, do a favor to yourself and get a life. This poll is just about FT interface. I like to see FT interface, TIR interface, direct acess to axes... And I'm not a moron that will vote "no" even in one TIR interface poll.

Some people here are pathetic, sorry to say.

[Wolf_Rider]

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

I like to see FT interface, TIR interface, direct acess to axes...

that would have been better to put up a poll around, eh

something like:
headtracker access through hacks?
headtracker access without hacks?
don't care either way?

[swiss]

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

And because of that, you voted no.

Please, do a favor to yourself and get a life. This poll is just about FT interface. I like to see FT interface, TIR interface, direct acess to axes... And I'm not a moron that will vote "no" even in one TIR interface poll.

Some people here are pathetic, sorry to say.

You should find yourself a job in marketing, maybe as a specialist for surveys.
It's funny you actually try to force the result you seek for.


Just in case there was a misunderstanding, let me present an example:
Basis: 100 people

- 30 of them want FT included (for whatever reason)
- 10 don't (see above)
- 60 don't care

Now you got scientific proof the majority doesn't care / doesn't want it to be included.
But this result wouldn't serve your purpose, instead you prefer to just cut out the "30 vs 10" to proof your point.
How cunning!