![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is a reason why the trailer is of it's quality. Why promote an image that is unobtainable to the average pc?
![]()
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Indeed, but people need something to look up to as well. It can be a very good advertisement strategy to show what the engine can do, why it stands above the competition, and why this simulation will be a good investment for years to come. So some max quality video's should be produced.
I was blown away by the graphics of Crysis when I first read about it in a magazine 5 years ago. I needed to have it! When I bought it, I knew my hardware wasn't up to the task but I played it anyway. It was really ugly at the time. So I built me a new PC. The only problem with a linear game like Crysis is that it looses it's appeal once you've completed it. CoD and IL2 don't have that problem. And I had sub-standard hardware for both IL2 and Forgotten Battles when I bought them as well. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Then offer two- they do it for blue ray movies etc. average PC, and high end. when I started with the first demo, I had a 16meg vid card (slightly above average in 01) and it started the whole race of upgrades- you'd think nv or ati would tie in with this- |
![]() |
|
|