Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2011, 04:51 PM
Kwiatek's Avatar
Kwiatek Kwiatek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 367
Default

Blackdog_kt you have probably right. Most opinions and data claim that float curraburator under negative G casue engine stall due to fuel lost but probably the truth is that lost power is beacuse of fuel flood curraburator and engine. When you apply negative G float in curraburator is going up and fuel flood curraburator. Probably with prolonged fuel flood engine could stop and then could be little problem with start it again. Of course moving prop will start engine again but it could need some time to do it.

I have a few time problem to start on ground inline engine of plane beacuse i gave it too much mixture.

I think Ms Shilling Oriffice was a small disc with hole to prevent fuel flood curraburator.


Ad to video with Spitfire flying aerobatic when he is making inverting flying he is actually in shallow dive with throttle back.


JG4_Helofly Spits or Hurricanes from BOB era have not too much engine workload. You opearated mostly throttle level beacuse you got CSP ( constant speed propeller unit) which mean that you just set only wanted RPM ( in fight maximum possible, in cruise depend of economy of fuel) and mixture level was also only for economical flying ( auto - reach - lean). Much more work load have planes with variable prop pitch like early 109s and early russian planes.

Last edited by Kwiatek; 01-24-2011 at 04:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-24-2011, 05:18 PM
JG4_Helofly JG4_Helofly is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwiatek View Post
JG4_Helofly Spits or Hurricanes from BOB era have not too much engine workload. You opearated mostly throttle level beacuse you got CSP ( constant speed propeller unit) which mean that you just set only wanted RPM ( in fight maximum possible, in cruise depend of economy of fuel) and mixture level was also only for economical flying ( auto - reach - lean). Much more work load have planes with variable prop pitch like early 109s and early russian planes.
Right, and there is not only prop pitch. Engine cooling is also "undermodeled" in IL2. Try to dive with cooling flaps open without power from 10000m. The engine will still run perfectly once you are at sea level. In RL you had to close these flaps to prevent the engine from getting too cold. Some other planes could be overboosted like the P47.
It might be interesting to watch player killing their machines because of abusiv operations.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-24-2011, 05:24 PM
Kwiatek's Avatar
Kwiatek Kwiatek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG4_Helofly View Post
Right, and there is not only prop pitch. Engine cooling is also "undermodeled" in IL2. Try to dive with cooling flaps open without power from 10000m. The engine will still run perfectly once you are at sea level. In RL you had to close these flaps to prevent the engine from getting too cold. Some other planes could be overboosted like the P47.
It might be interesting to watch player killing their machines because of abusiv operations.
Yes but it would affect most such plane with piston engines. Maby we will get it in COD
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-27-2011, 06:26 PM
Ra'Kaan Ra'Kaan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 18
Default

I love this thread! I have read the entire thing!

I apologize for not having anything to contribute on the subject, however, I wanted to post my appreciation for all the thought, dedication and hard work that goes into the mechanics of each and every plane in the IL-2 series.

This thread demostrates the fact that we all here respect the men and women who flew these amazing machines our desire to recreate as close as possible the conditions these people encountered in various circumstances.

I have worked in the aircraft manufacturing industry so many of the things discussed here intrigue me on a mechanical level.

Thank you posters for a fascinating discussion!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-28-2011, 01:00 PM
K_Freddie K_Freddie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 563
Default

I know....
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.