More severe moderation in update threads?

[Igo kyu]

Originally Posted by Bearcat

I think the overall moderation here is good.. but in some of these update threads I see stuff that just shouldn't be there... When Oleg points out in the first thread that he is aware of a bug or that the shots are pre beta or taken at a lower res etc.. and then we get googobs of posts pointing out the bug or the quality of the shots .. that Oleg mentioned in his initial post.. to me tat is a waste of space.

Agreed.

all this is unfinished.. so I find it kind of annoying at times that folks just can't appreciate the update for it's own sake.. and wait until the sim is at least nearer to completion or even released in a demo before the critics come out of the woodwork.

I disagree with that, because early on it is easier to make changes than it is later.

Originally Posted by heywooood

I would go one step further and say that some posters seem to feel obliged to identify perceived flaws in development shots not so much out of contempt for the sim but rather as if there is some special merit or reward system in place for finding Waldo - or worse - to attempt to demonstrate their own powers of observation or 'expertise' in a given aspect of whatever the screenshot depicts: be it the shape of a spinner or cowling, or the instrumentation of a cockpit, or the species of grass in a region etc.

This is about whether SoW should be a simulator or a game, and is asking for a game, in my reading of it. If history matters, and in a sim history matters, then details matter, and it's right to bring them up. Those who only want a game, and want it NOW may find this frustrating, but I would guess we are mostly simmers here.