Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-04-2010, 11:46 PM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
I agree as well.
If this is a debate, what about the concept of complete truth? By this I mean the ability for one to say what one thinks truthfully and honestly? Although a comment may seem harsh, perhaps (though) it is just honest? (of course, the post would have to be supported by evidence as you said)



Supported by evidence...I'm still waiting on your non flat, WRONG, cloud base whine evidence. Oleg has not posted shots that allow a determination as to cloud base shape. But yet you describe the images as being such.
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5

Last edited by SlipBall; 10-05-2010 at 12:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2010, 12:07 AM
BadAim BadAim is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 984
Default

I'll make one comment for the moment. Too often people hide behind "honesty" as an excuse for rudeness. This is not a new problem, as it is mentioned in writings known to be 3000+ years old. If one has a problem in this area, it is a good idea to remain silent, as it is better to be silent and thought a fool than to speak and prove it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2010, 09:36 AM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlipBall View Post
Supported by evidence...I'm still waiting on your non flat, WRONG, cloud base whine evidence. Oleg has not posted shots that allow a determination as to cloud base shape. But yet you describe the images as being such.
I did back it up. I posted a scientific review of the matter (this isn't a joke by the way). I didn't post any pictures (apart from one to show the cauliflower effect) but if needed I could easily. If I'm honest, I thought a simple goggle-images search would throw up so many results, that I didn't have to post a picture to support my argument (as I felt the scientific review was quite watertight). In hindsight, a picture is quite noticeable, so adding one would have done no harm at all. Indeed, I can link you to my post if you want; unless you saw it?
I also linked to a series of SoW pictures which clearly showed the lack of a flat-cloud-base. Are we talking specifically about this weeks update or the whole SoW series of updates?

Last edited by philip.ed; 10-05-2010 at 09:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.