![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The "dirty bomb" of the cold war era was still a nuclear device.
Those are not atomic bombs at all. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
5 giorni fa It is strange that the US named their nuclear bomb program Manhattan project, it is more likely that the Manhattan project was a Nazi plan to attack New York City which they took over.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/science/30manh.html Splitter |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Killing thousands of civilians project" would be better.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
First, the project killed tens of thousands, not just thousands.
Second, it saved many more than it killed. Third, neither bomb killed as many as the firebombings of Tokyo. The firebombing of Dresden produced more "total destruction". Fourth, the project ended WWII. Fifth, War is Hell. Sixth, there was a recent thread about this. Splitter |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nuclear Weapons are fun loving colorful entertaining little devices which are good for the environment, educational and perfectly safe for children to play with ... providing they belong to the American right.
If anyone else has them they are evil weapons of mass destruction |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Splitter |
![]() |
|
|