![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
BTW,TD,the mounted guns of some planes,like bombers,dive bombers,have no recoil,like the IL-2 tail gun.
Is recoil for those MGs going to be added in some version? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First many thanks to TD for there tireless work in keeping this sim going! now ive read alot of post on this thread and some have touched a little on it and i do know its too late for my queston to become reality in 4.10 but in the next patch is it in the works or has it been discused giving us Jug lovers a true M ?
Keep up the good work guys ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
M? I thought they go only up to DD?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just want to see hydraulic failure, as seen in guncam footage, and on the zero on the main menu of sturmovik, and burst tyres in the game if its possible at all.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Haha! Good one Viikate. Personally I'd like to see the time spent on the multitude of missing early war types.
Cheers, Fafnir_6 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would not mind seeing some more bombers, espically for the Germans and Italians. Like the DO-217 for the germans and the Fiat BR.20 and Cant Z.1007 for the Italians. Just some more bombers in general would be nice.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just got hold of a copy of the second IL2 demo, and the amount of torque modelled is much more than is in 4.09. With airframe stresses being introduced in 4.10 any chance we could have the torque put back to the more, IMHO, accurate earlier levels? The demo is great fun to fly by the way. Thanks for all of your hard work btw.
Regards |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Z.1007,same BR.20,SoW matters.Forget it. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It would be nice to get some more loadout options for Mosquitos, like drop tanks and rockets for the FB, and larger size bombs such as were used later in the war.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Agreed, some kind of camera/model movement effect would make it a lot more immersive. Not a bad suggestion. However, we don't know how problematic it is to implement. And non-pilot positions probably have very low priority for the developers. Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|