![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe TD could make tracks exportable to format which could be interpreted by other programs? I.e. by TacView (http://lomac.strasoftware.com/tacview-en.php), which is used for analyzing LockOn/DCS tracks now. That would make teaching novice pilots a lot easier.
However, I think it should be taken with care. It should export only those track, which are allowed to be exported. Some server option is needed, which would allow or deny such exports, so that people could not abuse such tracks in virtual wars. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The night of IL2.
In european IL2 maps you can see a weak sunlight coming from the horizon. Is that midnight sun? If so,it shouldn´t happen on western european maps (except Norway and Finland) and Mediterranean maps? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Fafnir_6 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
IMO, guns convergence is best set by the program. The Il2 is well done, and when you are online you know GC is set equitably for all aircraft.
I remember the MSFT CFS2 online where all kinds of convergence tricks were used. I recall corsairs that could knock you down from 3,000 meters. You can make convergence changes in IL2, but you can't do weird stuff with it. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Gun harmonisation in game is a little too simplistic though. At the very least the ability to choose between point bore sighting and pattern bore sighting on aircraft that had both would be very useful. Here is a good article on mid war USN pattern boresighting: http://www.researcheratlarge.com/Air...nBoresighting/ |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
When you check into Hyperlobby look at all those involved on Forgotten Battle servers. Look at all the other game servers. I'd say don't fix it... if it isn't broke. There is a continued huge following on Forgotten Battles and it all is caused by the way Oleg has done the IL2 for Online Play. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Whilst its true a lot of online players treat the game more as a 3d first person shooter I played online for several years back around 2002/2003 and my observation was most online players are not stupid, they can manage quite complex engine management for example. It also seems to me there were a lot of online players, especially playing co-ops and virtual wars, that actually liked historical accuracy. However ASIDE from all that pointless online versus offline nonsense which can be fun to argue about but is really totally off topic: - if you recall 3 or 4 years back a lot of online players were unhappy with the switch to box/pattern harmonization on the American planes like the P51 - the ability to optionally switch aircraft currently using a box harmonization to a point bore sighting would greatly increase the lethality of the 0.50 cal for online players who are a good shot whilst allowing new players to keep the box pattern To be honest I don't see this as an offline/online issue at all. Last edited by WTE_Galway; 08-05-2010 at 04:53 AM. |
![]() |
|
|