Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-07-2010, 06:09 PM
BigC208 BigC208 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 252
Default

Animals! Great. Just make sure Daniel stays away from the sheep.
I bet he is from Maine, USA.
Maine, where the men are men and the sheep are nervous.

About the DRM, stayed away from RoF because of it. Now that they
got rid of it I'll buy the boxed Iron Cross that will be released soon.

Last edited by BigC208; 06-07-2010 at 06:11 PM.
  #2  
Old 06-08-2010, 03:27 PM
Daniël's Avatar
Daniël Daniël is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigC208 View Post
Animals! Great. Just make sure Daniel stays away from the sheep.
I bet he is from Maine, USA.
Maine, where the men are men and the sheep are nervous.

About the DRM, stayed away from RoF because of it. Now that they
got rid of it I'll buy the boxed Iron Cross that will be released soon.
Hi BigC208,
I'm not from the USA, I'm living in the Netherlands
__________________

If you are insecure: use more bullets.
  #3  
Old 06-09-2010, 01:37 AM
BadAim BadAim is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniël View Post
Hi BigC208,
I'm not from the USA, I'm living in the Netherlands
It's your 'more bullets' sig that has him confused, he has fallen prey to the common misconception that trigger happy rednecks only live in the states. Truth is we can be found all over the world. (but mostly in the more rural areas)
  #4  
Old 06-09-2010, 01:51 AM
Desode Desode is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 249
Default

Ok, I'm going to risk it, and I'll finally start to let myself get excited !
Desode
  #5  
Old 06-09-2010, 12:15 PM
Erkki Erkki is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniël View Post
Hi BigC208,
I'm not from the USA, I'm living in the Netherlands
In your DP, is it this 109:



Just visited that museum last Saturday in the squad meeting.

EDIT: it now has the engine cowling closed, and some planes around it have changed.
  #6  
Old 06-09-2010, 02:06 PM
Daniël's Avatar
Daniël Daniël is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 266
Default

Right, Erkki! I found the picture on http://www.virtualpilots.fi/en/hist/...mersukansi.jpg
Although I live in the Netherlands I speak Finnish. I'm bilingual.
__________________

If you are insecure: use more bullets.
  #7  
Old 06-10-2010, 05:34 PM
Il2Pongo Il2Pongo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 88
Default Cockpit weathering

I think the cockpit weathering is fine, except for the ratty brown strip of paper on the right, it looks like it was recovered from a wreck that is 40 years old.
To me that cockpit looks like it is used but newish, which I think would be the default for 109es in the BOB.
  #8  
Old 06-10-2010, 08:08 PM
major_setback's Avatar
major_setback major_setback is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lund Sweden
Posts: 1,415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Il2Pongo View Post
I think the cockpit weathering is fine, except for the ratty brown strip of paper on the right, it looks like it was recovered from a wreck that is 40 years old.
To me that cockpit looks like it is used but newish, which I think would be the default for 109es in the BOB.
I would think that a very thin coat of paint would be used for interiors. Weight is an issue. It wouldn't take much to scratch it if that's the case. I could be wrong ( - usually am!).
The buses where I live recently installed new ticket machines. They only had a thin coat of paint. After only a couple of weeks they were scuffed and scratched and looked ten years old.
__________________
All CoD screenshots here:
http://s58.photobucket.com/albums/g260/restranger/

__________


Flying online as Setback.
  #9  
Old 06-10-2010, 09:34 PM
Romanator21 Romanator21 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 507
Default

The images are simply amazing. Everything is *perfect* The Heinkel is beautiful, and I can't wait to simply take a sight-seeing joy-ride in it across the channel.
  #10  
Old 06-11-2010, 09:24 AM
F16_Petter F16_Petter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 35
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by major_setback View Post
I would think that a very thin coat of paint would be used for interiors. Weight is an issue. It wouldn't take much to scratch it if that's the case. I could be wrong ( - usually am!).
The buses where I live recently installed new ticket machines. They only had a thin coat of paint. After only a couple of weeks they were scuffed and scratched and looked ten years old.
Well.. after 2 months would there be any paint left then?

@work our planes are used 4-6 flights per day (minimum) and after about a year they look like the screenshots.. BUT mostly on certain parts where the wear is "induced" by the pilot. Control collumn, switches, knobs etc. The rest of the wear comes by age not by direct cause of the pilot or techs.

Any paint is done with a minimum of one coat.
There are some exposed parts of panels etc that would at least have a primer paint as first layer aswell. However, deep "scratches" would expose bare metal if the cut was violent or caused by a sharp edge or hard material of some kind. Saving weight is probly more an issue when painting the external (whole aircraft). We dont paint our cockpits with more than one layer anyway.. it is sufficient.

Ive read some of the comments and this is my reply:
If your calculations are right, If the cockpits look like this just after a few weeks.. and there is never a "new plane" for very long.
how would they not look after a couple of months? Is there a reason why the paint would stop chipping after reaching a certain stage or=??

All im saying is that there is a difference between parts that the pilot operates and parts that he does not touch and is weared over time caused by other factors such as temperature, sunlight exposure, humidity etc.
And it would be FUN with perhaps three versions of a cockpit.

1. Brand New
2. "Runned in" (something like the screenhots we see today)
3. Deteriorated (something worse than the screenshots we see today)
4. Also canopies and windshields with a similar wear or visibility factor would be interesting.. (or not relly nice but realistic)
It doesnt have to be extreme, it could be just noticable and cause maybe just a little bit of less transparency.

Maybe not for SoW, but for the FUTURE

Last edited by F16_Petter; 06-11-2010 at 09:27 AM.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.