Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2010, 01:48 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

I'm not sure if this is good or bad. Will it affect time scale?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2010, 01:58 PM
Richie's Avatar
Richie Richie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,450
Default

Pretty sure that is from the 10 min short film called "The German" I put questions up on simhq about it. I'm Hackl in there.



http://www.thegermanmovie.com/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-11-2010, 02:06 PM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

Quote:
...we are rebuilding version
Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
I'm not sure if this is good or bad. Will it affect time scale?
Almost certainly just a normal part of the development process. Most likely, they try to create a 'stable' compile of the software every so often, and then updates to separate parts are tested with this. Every so often, they need to incorporate the changes into a new compile - the 'rebuild' that Oleg refers to. If you try to continually incorporate all changes into your development compile, you can end up with hard-to-track-down conflicts, problems with testing, and much else.

Of course, he could mean he's starting again from scratch.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-11-2010, 08:24 PM
Oleg Maddox Oleg Maddox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJWest View Post
Almost certainly just a normal part of the development process. Most likely, they try to create a 'stable' compile of the software every so often, and then updates to separate parts are tested with this. Every so often, they need to incorporate the changes into a new compile - the 'rebuild' that Oleg refers to. If you try to continually incorporate all changes into your development compile, you can end up with hard-to-track-down conflicts, problems with testing, and much else.
Correct
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-11-2010, 08:30 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

So Oleg, does this mean that the pictures and videos that we were shown before are now redundant?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-11-2010, 08:33 PM
choctaw111's Avatar
choctaw111 choctaw111 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
So Oleg, does this mean that the pictures and videos that we were shown before are now redundant?

I guess it would be as redundant as a "work in progress", as we have been told EVERY update. Things change throughout the development process.
__________________
STRIKE HOLD!!!
Nulla Vestigia Retrorsum
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-11-2010, 08:38 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by choctaw111 View Post
I guess it would be as redundant as a "work in progress", as we have been told EVERY update. Things change throughout the development process.
So true I'd be interested though to see comparison shots of any details that have been signifcantly changed
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-11-2010, 08:42 PM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
So Oleg, does this mean that the pictures and videos that we were shown before are now redundant?
I hope not! As Oleg said, it is normal to do this while developing software: actually, for a big project like SoW:BoB, trying to do it any other way would be madness. I'd imagine that as you get nearer the end of the development cycle, such rebuilds tend to become more complex because (a) you are dealing with more code and data, and (b) you have to be more fussy about sorting out minor bugs that you could work around in earlier development stages.

Remember too that a lot of changes may have no effect on graphics, though since we've been seeing WIP, hopefully visual changes will be improvements.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-11-2010, 02:14 PM
Stranzki Stranzki is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
I'm not sure if this is good or bad. Will it affect time scale?
Putting together new versions of a software internally is a pretty normal process and very important. On this way you can assure that every part of the application is working and more important is working together as a unit.
The other way round would be the "big bang integration". Wait to the very end, put everything together and see what happens - most time nothing works at all and the project is delayed by months, years or is aborted
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-11-2010, 04:06 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Great news, thanks chaps
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.