![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
| View Poll Results: CLICKABLE COCKPITS - | |||
| YES - CLICKABLE COCKPITS |
|
124 | 51.24% |
| NO - CLICKABLE COCKPITS |
|
118 | 48.76% |
| Voters: 242. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
You can break your Bf-109 engine by putting it in over-boost if over 80% power, and you can over-speed your Hurricane engine in a dive. If your engine overheats for 9 minutes, reduce power until you see "Engine:normal" and now you can overheat it again for 9 minutes. Things like oil pressure, fuel pressure, etc mean nothing. Fly a Dornier in manual pitch and it should give you just a little taste of how involved managing an engine can be. You will probably break it your first time taking off. Still, one can easily apply more throttle than pitch and fly happily, and most engine instruments are just decoration. Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Erkki; 02-10-2010 at 06:23 AM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
For me clickable cockpits do not equate to realism. Although the clickable cockpit may has a visually accurate representation of the cockpit, for me, the use of the mouse to select the switches is anything but realistic or intuative.
I will, in all probability, continue to use my hotas controls, expand my home-brew BL0836 based switch box and use the keyboard for other less used functions. Even though the switches aren't in the correct locations, for me, I find it more realistic and imersive. Lets face it wether your flying, driving or using a keyboard, once you train your body to know the position of a physical switch, you don't have to look for it to use it. cheers! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Clickpits would be nice to have but not essential. Oleg has already said that everything is there in the SOW engine to allow every switch in a pit to be clicked (either through a keystoke or the mouse). However, from what he says he'll be leaving that up to third party developers. I believe he does recognise the need to bring on board the FSX crowd.
As for improved modelling of aircraft sub systems and engine tolerances, I'm with Blackdog all the way. I really hope the developers listen to his views. Again, I'm quite happy if this is provided in later paid for add-on packs. Optional of course..... Last edited by Sutts; 02-10-2010 at 09:47 AM. |
![]() |
|
|