![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's a difference between IN-cockpit and EXTERNAL sounds.
Some people forget that in airshows the sound you get is anything but close to the sound the pilot is listening to. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
not hard to capture audio, its implementing it into the sim thats the hard part and the external doppler effect into a game. this is the hard part flyby effect and external engine whine. only way really to do this is a recorded sample flyby for each model it could be done . maybe some trickery with hd audio to get the distant doppler effect as well. but this is creating audio parameters in the engine .. Last edited by diveplane; 12-31-2009 at 01:23 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the easiest way would be record a separate file for the in-cockpit sounds. It can't go wrong.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great video... very good capture of the audio of those two planes. I've had the great amount of fun to see a Spitfire IX and Bf109E fly in formation past me at an airshow and the sound alone is spectacular. That Bf109G has even more whine to it than the E model I think.
Implementing that into the sim will be hard. But I do hope that the sounds are more sounding like their real life counterparts than in past iterations. Hard because not every engine or plane is still flying to do the audio capture and I'm not sure if Oleg's team doesn't get a chance to get out and do a full sound capture to even try. But a better more authentic attempt would be great... let us hope so.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think it's much of a problem for TFC and other groups that handle such aircraft to just put a microphone inside the plane's cockpit during a routine flight, start-up and etc.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
inside cockpits is the easy part. its the externals thats the hard part.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In-cockpit sound?
For SoW I think the doppler effect "IN-COCKPIT" is a must (no more engine radar...)
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
![]() |
|
|