![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The longbow will be in trouble if it encounters enemies with flying hammers. An aircraft with a funny hat deserves to be followed by one with a funny name: ![]() all identifying marks have been blurred out, so no use looking for them. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
is it a mirage maybe a rafel?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mirage III?
And yeah, the Apache photo is a photoshop. On the other hand, this one isn't.. ![]() Haha, bonus if you can name THAT plane |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dassalt Mirage III
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All good guesses but wrong... remember, funny name
For another hint, the production of this plane involved spies and stolen plans. The plane in the tree is a Huff-Daland Duster. Leaving the N-number visible is an invitation to cheat, so I did ![]() Last edited by kozzm0; 11-27-2009 at 04:52 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No idea but did you hear the F-35 plans were stolen?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's another one that is NOT a photoshop:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some of the info was heisted via computer espionage, or something like that... but not all of it. It had something to do with lax security because of multiple countries having access to the information.
But in the case of the plane above, ALL the plans were stolen, in one of the biggest spy operations of the 20th century. That should be enough of a dead giveaway. If anyone gets mad when they figure it out, at least it's not an obscure prototype, and it is a different plane from the plans. I think the f-35 plans may as well have been stolen, I believe it's an ill-conceived plane. The US DoD is always banking on multirole planes, the f-18 is a good one but the JSF as a plane that can do everything ends up with flaws in every department. In particular, the US has plenty of big carriers and it's not so vital to have a VTOL plane that can also fight, by adding the VTOL they had to weaken its fuselage to make the weight specs. So it's vulnerable to hits and flak, as currently designed, and it has no answer to the orbital-vectored thrust of the 4.5-generation Russian planes and upcoming PAK-FA. They expect air combat to be all about beyond-visual range and avionics in the future, they thought the same thing in the 60's and it didn't work. Except when it's not a big war. [crouches waiting for the swarm of f-35 defenders to attack] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of teh saabs? viggen?
|
![]() |
|
|