|
|
|||||||
| Units, artifacts and armor-bearers Discussion, questions and solutions about units, artifacts and armor-bearers. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-26-2009, 01:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I, personally, do not appreciate anything that reduces leadership. If as a warrior you have 40k leadership, 10% of it is a big deal. I'd rather use the Inquisitor's sword (the one you take from thomas torkve) and enjoy the extra 20% troops. besides, that sword is guaranteed and it morale falls seriously on when there are paladins, priests and inquisitors in the enemy army.
|
|
#2
11-26-2009, 01:43 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not sure exactly, but I would suspect not. I don't think 5 additional attack is better than having 11% more troops. Moreover, that weapon slot is generally giving you something like 3 to 5 attack already, so it is often the comparison of 2ish attack and 3 defense vs 11% more troops. I had the sword of equilibrium when I found it (+5 atk) Class three elemental axe (5 ATK, 10% crit) and inquisitor blade (already mentioned) so it really didn't make sense to take the huge hit to troop size.
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
