Daidalos Team's Room -QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS ONLY on IL2 Authorized Addons

[Daiichidoku]

i sincerely hope that TD is concenrtating more on fixing the known issues with the game and all that is included in it, and only introducing "new" planes or objects that are relatively easy to do without external/coxkpit model changes(eg: a +11lbs tempest) before giving any thought to MORe planes, ships, and other confetti

perhaps if they run out of things to correct they can spend more effort on the pie-in-the-sky stuff for 5.0...or perhaps wait for 5.1 for it


this thread seems to be increasingly a wish list of every plane not in the game , sheesh

[Daiichidoku]

just remembered an issue, TD

back when 1C "de-sync'd" or "unsync'd" 50 cals in US type, they did a boo-boo

they forgot to do it for the P38J in default loadout config

currently, one must take bomb or droptank loadout to get the unsync'd 50 cals, default loadout on P38J gives "sync'd" 50 cals

please fix this sirs

[nearmiss]

We need changes in the core programming.

It has always amazed me at the number of requests for new aircraft, when we already have so many. There are many I have never virtually flown.

Never could understand why people are always clamouring for more aircraft.

They don't fly them online.(dogfight servers) They pick the uber aircraft and only fly them.

Sorry, but I don't think you could ever have enough aircraft models to satisfy some people.

[FC99]

Originally Posted by Daiichidoku

just remembered an issue, TD

back when 1C "de-sync'd" or "unsync'd" 50 cals in US type, they did a boo-boo

they forgot to do it for the P38J in default loadout config

currently, one must take bomb or droptank loadout to get the unsync'd 50 cals, default loadout on P38J gives "sync'd" 50 cals

please fix this sirs

All loadouts use same MG.

[Billfish]

So does DT have any questions regarding the information posted below or the Ki-61 or even Ki-43 that I can help answer?

K2

Originally Posted by Billfish

The thread below has been updated with more points as to the Ki-61 (with some overflow of similar things to Ki-43)......More coming.

http://78sentai.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=401

K2

[TheGrunch]

Could you guys make it so that it's impossible to use smaller increments of flaps with them set on an axis in aircraft with two-position flaps like the Spitfire and Hurricane?

[Xilon_x]

i want to respond to nearmiss.I think peoples request much airplane because not satisfied.
Il-2 sturmovik 1946 have a long list and good list of WW2 airplane.initially when the first il-2 came out had all list RUSSIAN airplane BOMBERS-FIGHTERS-RECONNAISSANCES-SEAPLANE-GLIDERS-JET i loock in the bock all list RUSSIAN plane and compare whit IL-2 sturmovik list and i conclude that
Russian aircraft are almost all missing 2 or 3 RUSSIAN bombers and jet plane.
GERMAN have good list but not complete
ENGLAND not have the important BOMBERS and fighters.
FRANCE not have airplane only 1 but only AI
ITALY have good list but missing all bombers and some fighter and seaplane.
U.S.A. good list but missing some bombers and reconnaissances airplane.
JAPAN missing airplane ecc. ec. all nation
now the PRIORITY is the FRANCE because france not have 1 fighter flyiable.

i THINK now actualy il-2 have a good list i not remember but now list is 270 type of airplane of all nation.for complete list MISSING about 130 type of airplane and 20 type of prototype and luft46.
LUFT 46 list and secret airplane was a good idea in past time to insert in il-2 sturmovik.BUT i REMEMBER the name of programm is IL_2 sturmovik and not WW2 SIMULATOR.

[nearmiss]

Sorry, not buying your music. We finally have someone that actually has the programming ability and desire to fix alot of problems within the actual core of the IL2.

The IL2 code is open now and building aircraft,etc. is nothing like coding the core programming. It's like asking highly skilled person to wash cars for a living.

There are sites where you can request the kind of stuff you want. If we get new aircraft from TD I'm OK with it, otherwise no way I request them.

We've been reading new aircraft whine threads for 10 years and now we have someone really working to do major improvements and the whines persist.

[Xilon_x]

ok ok nearmis i am agree not new airplane but fixing actual airplane and physics .

in mission builder if i put the gray runway ad after clik fly if i go to te border of runway airplane explode in fact, the airplane would just go down the step and damaged a bit 'to the laws of physics should not explode.

when the plane taxis on the ground it bounces a little too much dirt

these strong rebound on the ground give the impression that the airplane does not have a specific weight.
when the plane taxis on the runway is good.

if i put black runway and i go to the border of the runway the airplane jumping like a spring, and after falling explodes.should move a little bad but not jump.

not real physic.

[nearmiss]

Now you're talking...

We need to fix things that require code changes within the core programming.