|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-08-2009, 10:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
You don't NEED to have each valve modeled.
But if you CAN model each valve, it won't kill it, anyway... It adds to immersion. Flight simulators, and games in general, don't have their realism level determined by the major stuff. In this field, they are all very close to each other (when you talk about modern games) - nice graphics, good effects, immersive sounds... The difference is in detail. For example, you wouldn't even notice if in Rise of Flight the gun parts didn't move in external views when they are reloaded. But they do. Do you actually NEED to see a stupid gun moving? Or to see that AK-47 inside the truck and besides the driver on DCS? No. Can you do this without causing any major trouble? Yes. Will it add to immersion? Yes. So, why not to do it? It's just my opinion, anyway, but I really think that, if you want to model something, model it to the maximum level of detail you can. It won't be perfect, but at least is the closer you can get to perfection. 
|
|
#2
11-08-2009, 10:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have to admit that I don't really "get" the "too much detail" argument...MORE detail is always better. I also don't understand the "why bother with so much detail, you can't see it at 30,000 feet"? My thought is...Right, so you can't see that much detail at 30,000, but you can see detail at 1000 feet. Why not make the argument about night flying and ask something like, "I can't see the ground at night, so why bother modeling it?"
|
|
#3
11-08-2009, 10:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was hoping a cockpit screenshot in game of a Bf 109, Bf 110, Blenheim Mk.IV or a Gladiator Mk.II
Buth anyway, good ships, so very detailed. (i think will need SLI 4890  )
__________________
 Core2Quad 9400 2.66Ghz 45nm - 4x2gb ddr2 800 Kingston = 8GBRAM - XFX Radeon HD 5850 Black Edition 1Gb DDR5 765Mhz/1440steam/ 4.5Gbps- 1/2 Terabyte Wn D 32mb - Mother Assus P5QLE - P&C Silencer 750W - Sentey RJA246 LCD 4 coolers - DVD/RW 20x LG - LCD Samsung P2350n 23" - Edifier C2 2.1+1 waiting for: Il-2: Armée de l’Air; Continuation War; Battle for Moscow; Stalingrad; El Alamein; Sicily; The West Air Campaign; Berlin ZakKandrachoff
|
|
#4
11-09-2009, 12:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
11-09-2009, 12:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
In general cooperation was with 1C, not personally with me. The part of our source code, my guys, models as a basis used in many games of 1C and othes. This a bit help us to make BoB better than Il-2  .
|
|
#7
11-09-2009, 12:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok.
I will read-answer more tomorow. No time at the moment.
|
|
#8
11-09-2009, 10:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 I have a question that I don’t know if is already answer. If it was answer already, sorry, ok? Is about maniobrability of the airplane. My question is if this is going to be more like LOMAC or like Il-2. I put the example the maneuver of the Messerschmitt bf 109 version G, That was impossible of controlled the aircraft: when I turn Left (in the Joystick, not pull so strong), the plane go very strong to the right and stall and do crazy things. Result: For me, this is Impossible to fly. Is for this only and particularly think that i fly very more hours LOMAC. Have more best control of the aircraft. somebody please correct me if I am wrong
__________________
Core2Quad 9400 2.66Ghz 45nm - 4x2gb ddr2 800 Kingston = 8GBRAM - XFX Radeon HD 5850 Black Edition 1Gb DDR5 765Mhz/1440steam/ 4.5Gbps- 1/2 Terabyte Wn D 32mb - Mother Assus P5QLE - P&C Silencer 750W - Sentey RJA246 LCD 4 coolers - DVD/RW 20x LG - LCD Samsung P2350n 23" - Edifier C2 2.1+1 waiting for: Il-2: Armée de l’Air; Continuation War; Battle for Moscow; Stalingrad; El Alamein; Sicily; The West Air Campaign; Berlin ZakKandrachoff
|
|
#9
11-09-2009, 10:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Zakkandrachoff, I don't think that's possible at all, unless you want a Spitfire with fly-by-wire
 .I also fly Lock On, so I know what are you talking about. Yes, you do have more control. But that's because of the FBW. Of course it's easier to control an Su-27, when compared to an Bf-109G. It was made 40 years after the 109, so basically it has 40 years of technology improvements built in, including computer systems that make the aircraft easier to handle. It's the evolution. About your Gladiator, don't worry. With all these third-party development stuff, I think a Gladiator cockpit will be released within a month after the release .
|
|
#10
11-10-2009, 01:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
first: proton45, my jostick is very well config, is the microsoft. (I will change it in 2010) 2° lucas: i dont mean only LOMAC ( flying A-10 or Su-25 don't append that) , because I fly Laggs and is very similar to the Bf 109 problem. And, like you said, the Spitfire is a Dream compared to the 109. Only I hope is Balance a little both. Not so Dream and not so Hell maneuver. I remember the Jane´s Attack Squadron, (old simulator, low compared whit il-2, whit crappy mission builder) that Bf 109G don´t have that problem. and when i put "first the Gladiator", i was saying compared whit the Tiger mod But good your point, so manny fans will build so many aircraf and mods in some months after the release jaja. SOW BOB 1946 I can only imagine  And I hope too that the AI will be more "noob" and slow movements that is in Il-2 In average skills. the computer kick my ass  in average, dont tell you in good or expert.
__________________
Core2Quad 9400 2.66Ghz 45nm - 4x2gb ddr2 800 Kingston = 8GBRAM - XFX Radeon HD 5850 Black Edition 1Gb DDR5 765Mhz/1440steam/ 4.5Gbps- 1/2 Terabyte Wn D 32mb - Mother Assus P5QLE - P&C Silencer 750W - Sentey RJA246 LCD 4 coolers - DVD/RW 20x LG - LCD Samsung P2350n 23" - Edifier C2 2.1+1 waiting for: Il-2: Armée de l’Air; Continuation War; Battle for Moscow; Stalingrad; El Alamein; Sicily; The West Air Campaign; Berlin ZakKandrachoff
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
