![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Both the Hurricane and Spitfire had something that the Yak and the LaGG didn't have..... armour plating behind the pilot's seat and a firewall between the cockpit and the fuel tank.
The I-i53 ahd a terrible reputation for the airflow blowing through the undercarriage well turning the cockpit into a blast furnace when the non-self sealing or armoured fuel tanks caught fire. It is because of this that Soviet pilots never felw with the canopy cover ftted, as they needed to escape in a hurry when hit. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Most of Panzergranate's posts involve randomly spewing historical info. Not always relevant.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thats not neccisarily a bad thing.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And that's not the only reason I-153 Chaika pilots had their canopy open. But also because it gave them a better view, and they weren't restricted by the canopy. And it was only a a couple of types of I-153s that had canopies. Most were open cockpit like the I-16s. That was a good discussion. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah i would have called it an argument but it was more freindly.
more of a gentlemans disagreement. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Oh and Yak-3 wins every time. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
as you say with the first part but i fear that the soviet winter has messed with your brain, you dont know what your saying."Oh and Yak-3 wins every time"
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dunno if its the Soviet Winter, continuous work hours, or was Panzer's sudden ramble? But I think your right. lol
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Panzer, yet again you confuse me with completely random talk lol. |
![]() |
|
|