|
|
#12
10-30-2009, 12:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Hopefully he has more sense than you and actually researches the game before disregarding it based purely on who you think developed it.  The ToW games are actually made with their partners in the project, battlefront.com (Americans..). It is also more realistic than MoW is, which is also why i believe you will not see these change you keep requesting to be "fixed" in MoW. Why should they make one game more like the other? Clearly they wanted the two games to be separate for the different tastes in games people might have. Now as for the "gimped uk and usa" have you ever read a book about the war?..Y'know, actual facts as opposed to what your friends tell you? The reason you seem to think the Germans are over powered is because they infact WERE over powered. Seriously, pick up a book and read (or watch a documentary) about some of the battles and you'll be shocked that the Germans didn't win. Luckily Hitler made quite a few mistakes  .I will agree that MoW missed out on few tanks here and there, but considering what other games (CoH and the sort) give us in terms of choice, MoW is still way ahead. They might even add some vehicles here and there in newer versions. But as far as the realism goes, i think if you want a more realistic experience you should try Theatre of War. It is as realistic as you are going to get from an RTS (aside from those hard-core hex turn-based ones that some old war-vets help make...but they are dull as dirt). Give the manual a read (on the Battlefront website) and you can see the thought they put in to making it realistic, ballistic trajectory, muzzle velocity, penetration values, types of damage inflicted, morale..I could go on.. Also the graphics are damn nice:     Unfortunately neither Battlefront or 1C are paying me for my advertising of their game, so i will stop posting here.
|
|
|
Threaded Mode