Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2009, 09:24 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan607 View Post
Those are the exhausts mate!
I know which id rather use
Yeah, I don't recall Yak or La pilots complaining about their planes getting hit with some rounds, and gasoline spilling into the cockpit. But it was all to common for the Hurricanes and Spitfires, which were prone to that because of a fuel tank being right there in front of them.

So I know which I'd rather use. lol
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-28-2009, 09:26 PM
Vulcan607 Vulcan607 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Angels 6
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
Yeah, I don't recall Yak or La pilots complaining about their planes getting hit with some rounds, and gasoline spilling into the cockpit. But it was all to common for the Hurricanes and Spitfires, which were prone to that because of a fuel tank being right there in front of them.

So I know which I'd rather use. lol
Werent they still using radial engines?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-28-2009, 09:29 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan607 View Post
Werent they still using radial engines?
Yak's used straight inline engines, except the Yak-11 which was a Yak-3 with a radial, but they were used as trainers; rather than fighters. La's used radials, but they were fuel injected. So that's why they don't cut out when you nose them down like the I-16 and I-153.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-28-2009, 09:31 PM
Vulcan607 Vulcan607 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Angels 6
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
Yak's used straight inline engines, except the Yak-11 which was a Yak-3 with a radial, but they were used as trainers; rather than fighters. La's used radials, but they were fuel injected. So that's why they don't cut out when you nose them down like the I-16 and I-153.
But radials were outdated technology.
oh course folk this is all in the name of fun
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2009, 09:38 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan607 View Post
But radials were outdated technology.
oh course folk this is all in the name of fun
Well there are really just one Radial engine, that the La's used. But there are two makers. First there was the La-5 with just a plain old M-82 Radial engine, fuel injected (this is 42' so it was more common than in the 30s.) After the La-5F which was just a higher RPM M-82, named the M-82 Engine. The La-5FN came out, which was a M-82FN radial engine. Once again the RPM was just increased, and the engine was lightened for better performance.

Once the La-7 came out, a new developer took charge and it became the ASh-82 radial engine. Which once more was just a M-82FN lightened even more, and higher RPMs. (history less over. )

And everyone knows Russia in general likes keeping things simple. And Radial engines are probably one of the simplest engines out there. lol
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2009, 09:39 PM
Vulcan607 Vulcan607 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Angels 6
Posts: 470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
Well there are really just one Radial engine, that the La's used. But there are two makers. First there was the La-5 with just a plain old M-82 Radial engine, fuel injected (this is 42' so it was more common than in the 30s.) After the La-5F which was just a higher RPM M-82, named the M-82 Engine. The La-5FN came out, which was a M-82FN radial engine. Once again the RPM was just increased, and the engine was lightened for better performance.

Once the La-7 came out, a new developer took charge and it became the ASh-82 radial engine. Which once more was just a M-82FN lightened even more, and higher RPMs. (history less over. )

And everyone knows Russia in general likes keeping things simple. And Radial engines are probably one of the simplest engines out there. lol
Thats all fine and dandy but its still not a rolls royce.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-02-2009, 04:06 PM
Panzergranate Panzergranate is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 167
Default

Both the Hurricane and Spitfire had something that the Yak and the LaGG didn't have..... armour plating behind the pilot's seat and a firewall between the cockpit and the fuel tank.

The I-i53 ahd a terrible reputation for the airflow blowing through the undercarriage well turning the cockpit into a blast furnace when the non-self sealing or armoured fuel tanks caught fire. It is because of this that Soviet pilots never felw with the canopy cover ftted, as they needed to escape in a hurry when hit.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2009, 07:50 PM
Panzergranate Panzergranate is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace View Post
Yeah, I don't recall Yak or La pilots complaining about their planes getting hit with some rounds, and gasoline spilling into the cockpit. But it was all to common for the Hurricanes and Spitfires, which were prone to that because of a fuel tank being right there in front of them.

So I know which I'd rather use. lol
I was refering to this misguided comment, but what with the pace of replies, it seems to have been forgotten.

The "Yak" is a large slow witted herbivore, an unusual choice for an aircraft name.

It didn't fair at all well against that other fighter named after a even larger slow witted herbivore, the "Buffalo" either.

If you want to see some weird names for aircraft, just check out the Royal Australian Airforce's name choices..... "Boomeriang", "Kangaroo", Wapitty", etc.

Last edited by Panzergranate; 11-04-2009 at 08:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-04-2009, 08:44 PM
flynlion flynlion is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Panzergranate View Post
I was refering to this misguided comment, but what with the pace of replies, it seems to have been forgotten.

The "Yak" is a large slow witted herbivore, an unusual choice for an aircraft name.

It didn't fair at all well against that other fighter named after a even larger slow witted herbivore, the "Buffalo" either.

If you want to see some weird names for aircraft, just check out the Royal Australian Airforce's name choices..... "Boomeriang", "Kangaroo", Wapitty", etc.
Yak is short for Yakovlev, the Soviet bureau that designed it. I have no idea how the Brewster Buffalo got its name LoL.

Last edited by flynlion; 11-04-2009 at 10:13 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-04-2009, 09:39 PM
Soviet Ace Soviet Ace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Guarding the skies of the Motherland!!
Posts: 1,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Panzergranate View Post
I was refering to this misguided comment, but what with the pace of replies, it seems to have been forgotten.

The "Yak" is a large slow witted herbivore, an unusual choice for an aircraft name.

It didn't fair at all well against that other fighter named after a even larger slow witted herbivore, the "Buffalo" either.

If you want to see some weird names for aircraft, just check out the Royal Australian Airforce's name choices..... "Boomeriang", "Kangaroo", Wapitty", etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by flynlion View Post
Yak is short for Yakolev, the Soviet bureau that designed it. I have no idea how the Brewster Buffalo got its name LoL.
Yeah, what Flynlion said. It's not named after the creature, Yak.

Yakovlev
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.