The IL2 was a great ground attack aircraft so armour was usually needed. So giving them plenty of armour.... but they were fodder for fighters, hence the rear gunner.
Im in agreement with some of the things here, such as it does seem a bit hard to destroy, but i think to myslef that maybe because itd ground attack hen i'll just switch to a different target and save my ammo, BUT the rear gunner is ridiculous. He was armed with a pea shooter that did over heat!! yet in the game it doesn't. ALSO.... has anyone noticed the ammo capacity when playing with limited ammo? (ammo capacity for rear gunner?)
i find the stuka to be similar. Far to well armoured and not as easy to take down as it should be.
|
09-28-2009, 12:06 PM
Threaded Mode