![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
More P-40 variants
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The P-40N is the only big omission (P-40N-15-CU would be definitive), although the P-40K-10-CU and P-40L-5-CU fall into the "nice to have" category.
FWIW, all of these aircraft served on the Eastern Front, so would also help to fill in the gaps there. The P-40L mostly served in the MTO. The P-40K mostly served in the SW Pacific, and was extensively used by the RAAF, which would help fill in the the gaps in the Australian TOE. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
P-40L would be "very nice to have" for MTO. A "hotrod" P-40, I'd love that.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
While the number of planes deployed to the MTO was nowhere near those deployed on the Eastern Front, and the battles in North Africa and Italy were nowhere as big or as important as the battles of Stalingrad and Kursk, the period from 1941-43 was just as important to Western Allied tactical aviation as it was in Russia. During this time, the US and UK gradually gained air superiority over the Axis, and refined the tactical and strategic bombing techniques which gave them utter air superiority by late 1944. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agree. Eastern ETO is basically complete, there's little to be done there, except updating some very old models (which would be a huge work BTW).
PTO, on the contrary, and sadly, will never be complete and well-balanced due to the NG issue. What remains as a prospective field for improvement is MTO (perhaps with BoF and BoB added and proper attention paid to naval warfare). The Med was won by the Allied by gaining naval and aerial superiority almost hand in hand. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Historically, the Japanese were dominant during the early war, and the allies dominated in the late war, but the individual planes used were more or less competitive. (e.g., Hurricane Mk. II vs. Ki-43, P-40N vs. Ki-44, P-51H vs. Ki-84) Quote:
Another promising area for the game would be Western Front Ops over the North Sea, English Channel, and Bay of Biscay from 1941-44. Many of the necessary maps, ships, and planes already exist. The only gaps are for the UK, and a very few necessary planes for the Germans. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Ship formations should have a lead ship with all others positioning themselves relative to the lead depending on their defined role. (Battleline, screen, scout, etc). Ships under attack should react (weaving, turning away from torpedoes, etc) Ships should avoid collisions, such as sinking ships. Smarter ship objects would make much more challenging targets for aircraft, so improve the game for pilots. The stock game could do with a wider range of ships specific to the Med, maybe taking oob for operation pedestal as a theme, but that could be addressed later. Last edited by Asheshouse; 06-10-2016 at 08:59 AM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But for air-naval warfare, IMHO would be more important to fix de insane behaviour of the AI pilots when they attack with torpedoes. When the previous waypoint to Gattack es reached, they change formation by default to 'Line Astern' and this action can't be reverted by the human flight leader: any order to switch to a different formation will be unheeded. Actually the AI pilots release their torpedoes from a distance to the target of less than 1200 m, even against vessels with strong AAA, when the torpedoes might be released from a longer a safety distance becuase they have ranges greater than 5000 m. A flight of big planes, like Bettys, He-111 or Ju-88, arranged in 'line astern' anf flying too low and too slow while they're approaching to their target, are easy prey for the AAA. Therefore, the AI behaviour should be changed: the human flight leader should be able for to change the flight formation accordingly with his tactics at any moment. I.e.: 'line abreast' or 'echelon left/right' in open formation are better than 'line astern' becuase: - The AAA must to disperse its fire instead of to concentrate it. - Releasing all the flight's torpedoes at the same time than the human leaader like a salvo from a safe distance (not less than 3000 m), the probabilty of to hit the target would increase as well as the survival of most or all of the planes. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Asked for this since 2008 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|