Merry Christmas & Lancaster Teaser

[Buster_Dee]

The Martin turret in the B24D is a close match except for computing sight and input box. Radios, autopilot, Flight Engineer panel layout, etc. fritter that savings away in a hurry. I'm using F for Freddie and S for Sugar as the basis for what internal gear to model. Those airframes suggest to me that the early equipment could soldier on if needed, so it would not be a stretch to have this Mk I cover the whole war. You'll hear less me this and me that in the future. I just happen to be the one who was free enough to start.

[shelby]

For Martin Turret

The Lancaster Mk VII was a variant produced by Austin, at their Longbridge factory. The main difference between the Mk VII and late production Mk I/IIIs was the use of a Martin turret in place of the FN50 mid-upper turret. The Martin turret carried two .5in Browning Mk II machine guns, giving much more punch than the .303s of the older turret. The turret was also moved forward, from its position behind the bomb bay to one above it.

The Martin turret arrived too late for inclusion on the first fifty of these aircraft, which retained the FN50. These aircraft were officially still Mk Is, but were often know as Mk VII (Interim). These aircraft saw some service in Europe before the surrender of Germany.

Another 180 aircraft were built as true Mk VIIs. These had the Martin mid-upper turret, and also used the FN82 rear turret, which also carried the .5in machine gun. Both the true and interim Mk VIIs were powered by the Merlin 24 engine.

The true Mk VIIs arrived too late for the war in Europe. They were then modified to the B. Mk VII (FE) standard, for use in the Far East. Although the proposed invasion of Japan was not needed, most of these aircraft did serve overseas.

http://www.historyofwar.org/subject_air_lancaster.html

By the way i hope to see and the Mkiii someday

[Sita]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R5NI-IrUU0

[Buster_Dee]

Why the III? Dambusters?

[Buster_Dee]

IceFire, there is one area that might help: interior views of the canopy framing. I could leave out all the fasteners, but I want to at least make an effort to represent them.

[IceFire]

Originally Posted by Buster_Dee

IceFire, there is one area that might help: interior views of the canopy framing. I could leave out all the fasteners, but I want to at least make an effort to represent them.

Next time I pay a visit I'll try and take some photos at least from the outside with my telephoto lens.

This video (starting at 9:30) has some decent interior shots: http://youtu.be/ceuU1UQuwVU

He makes mention of the Martin turret with the .50cals. So obviously a bit different from the British made Mark I. Fascinating interior shots. Also bonus of the Mosquito and the big 10 Merlin formation they did a couple of summers ago.

[shelby]

Originally Posted by Buster_Dee

Why the III? Dambusters?

Yes and different engines

[IceFire]

Originally Posted by shelby

Yes and different engines

On the other hand... the Mark I also was the foundation of the Mark I Special with the Tirpitz sinking bombs.

[Buster_Dee]

Originally Posted by shelby

Yes and different engines

Slight performance difference, and a few more switches above the starter switches. Sugar and Freddie both have the blanking plate for the extra switches, so the panels must have been built for both Mk.

[shelby]

Originally Posted by Buster_Dee

Freddie

Freddie is old Fred? If so it is mkiii so the panels is similar to the Sugar's