Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-15-2014, 05:37 PM
The_WOZ The_WOZ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
That's the difference between 12.7/.50 caliber and 7.62 mm/.30 caliber guns.
.
Yeah, I agree a bullet with a relative higher gunpowder load will travel farther, but what I mean is that in game, bullets _dissappear_ after 600m (Just made a test in the QMB and you can fly at 590m from the bomber, directly into the bullet stream of the bottom MG-81z and all the tracers will dissappear right in front of your propeller and you'll not receive a single hit)

Looking at the gun parameters of the game, MG-81 bullets exist (if Im reading it right) for 1.1seconds after leaving the gun.
Russian ShKAS, another 7.62mm gun with higher muzzle velocity but slighty smaller cartridge, the bullets weight is almost the same that the MG-81s, yet it exists for 2.2seconds after leaving the gun.
For the Browning .50 bullet life varies with round type, but is 6.4 secs on average
For the MG-FF, heavier round and slower muzzle velocity, average bullet life is 2.8secs
For the Breda SAFAT 12.7mm, which is a Browning .50 with a smaller cartridge and thus slower muzzle velocity (only 30m/sec faster than the MG-81) the bullet life time is the same as the .50: 6.4 secs on average.


It sure seems something is off with the MG-81, seeing as bullet life time is not exactly directly related with the ballistic properties of the gun.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-20-2014, 09:36 PM
TexasJG's Avatar
TexasJG TexasJG is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: U.S.
Posts: 114
Default

Daidalos Team, it has been two months since any type of official, or semi-official update. Could we get a little something, at least a grunt, be patient, go away, or something please.
Just being a little sarcastic.

The bomber functions in this patch are very greatly anticipated, myself anyway.
Thank you for the awesome work this team has done!!
It is greatly appreciated!!

Last edited by TexasJG; 03-21-2014 at 12:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-21-2014, 09:06 PM
76.IAP-Blackbird 76.IAP-Blackbird is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 167
Default

What the man above said
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-21-2014, 10:11 PM
nic727 nic727 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 353
Default

They are working hard (or not)...

Can't wait to see what you are doing!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-21-2014, 10:40 PM
wWwebBrowser's Avatar
wWwebBrowser wWwebBrowser is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 8
Default

All is quiet on the western front.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-22-2014, 09:40 AM
76.IAP-Blackbird 76.IAP-Blackbird is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 167
Default

maybe a good sign
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-22-2014, 02:44 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Another idea, which might be within the limits of the IL2 game engine:

Could oil splashes and bullet holes seen in the cockpit view be modeled in the external view?

Could there be damage textures to specifically indicate things like oil leaks from the engine? Maybe not as extreme as this picture, but you get the idea:

http://i412.photobucket.com/albums/p...psea4a5307.jpg
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.