![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The escorts should defend their charges, not only themselves.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the context of carriers being the home airfield, an example from real life.
Battle of Midway, 6th June 1942. From the Action Report by the Commander of Yorktown. Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Very cool FC99. Raises a question: Does only the attacked plane take defensive action or does the wingman/pair begin to engage? Assuming already in the pattern for landing.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Gives me another idea: could it be possible to issue a radio command to the own AA protection of the airfield to prevent them from firing? I can't count the times I was shot down by friendly AA guns while closely chasing a fighter over my own airfield... |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Of course, like everything else, a lot depended on the individual gun crew's skill and experience levels, and they just might keep right on firing anyways, or even mistake you as an enemy aircraft and shoot at you until someone realizes the mistake and stops... Happened a lot. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi, 1st I congrats to all Daidalos Team for the work about 1946 they are offering to improve this game still.
just my observation: would be possible to stop A.I. behaviour that we can see many times A.I. climb almost vertically for a long time gaining altitude and JUST EXACTLY at the moment of stall they level the nose and then continue to fly orizontally ..as nothing happened .. THIS is really annoying and innatural .. and frustrating.. because A.I. using - I see OFTEN- this manevuer A.I. make a lot of cheat: 1) it use this quite innatural manover to evade from enemy (human or A.i.) 2) It use often this manover to jump from high to hit you or other A.I. planes. Please can DAIDALOS TEAM LOOK to solve this?. Last edited by X-Raptor; 12-20-2012 at 09:28 PM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Is this an online occurance? AI cheats in other ways all through the enhancments of AI behaviour changes, but usually if they vert up until stall, they drop their noses and vert down until regain of controll. Eventually it just looks alike, when you head onto them with intention for a kill lacking energy and starve in sight of them without proper situational awareness. It sometimes looks líke that. Eventually a energy superior AI opponent with good Situational awareness tricks you out, if he recognizes, that you are about to stall and breaks his vert up towards horizontal flight, because he has enough margin for that maneuver, but it must not look like a sharp hook. Rather a mor or less slight curve. Bf109s can do that if you sit in a mosca. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
..It occurred to me for example in a mission where there were il2 bombing p39 defending bombers vs 190 and 109 attacing (a kursk campaign extract). I see this behaviour in more than one 109 just like you said creating a "sharp hook" at the bottom of the vertical uber-dive of A.I.s planes.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just noticed this:
8 Average Ki-43 III vs. a "box" of 3 Veteran B-24J in QMB. 5000m over the Okinawa map. No advantage to either side. The Ki-43 don't make head-on shots on the initial pass and don't make high-side attacks subsequently. Instead, they go for tail-chase attacks which are much more dangerous. Even worse, the B-24 try to act like fighters! None of them stick together in formation and I actually saw one of them doing a barrel roll. All of them will try to turn to avoid much more nimble fighters, often pulling high-G turns that have the plane "standing on its wing." Realistically, the bombers should tighten up their formation and possibly "jink" a bit when attacked. If one gets separated, it should "corkscrew" to try to spoil the attackers' aim while rejoining formation. Also, the rest of the formation should slow down to try to protect the damaged bomber as long as possible. As it is, by trying to maneuver like fighters, they seriously reduce the accuracy of their guns and give up the coordinated firepower of the "bomber box." In real life, the sort of high-G turns I saw would also rip the bombs off their shackles and send them through the bomb bay doors. It seems to me that, if it isn't already in the game, TD needs to have different AI for heavy bombers and similar planes (e.g., planes like the PBN or H8K) vs. smaller and faster attack bombers. Bombers also need different behavior routines for when they're loaded vs. unloaded. Edit: Same behavior for B-17G and B-29. And, even when the U.S. heavies are loaded with bombs! This is even more stupid behavior for a B-29 since they have the speed to outrun the Ki-43. They shouldn't be diving, turning and trying to dogfight. Instead, they should be keeping level, tightening formation and accelerating. Last edited by Pursuivant; 01-23-2013 at 03:04 AM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|