Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover
Reload this Page calm down
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-23-2012, 05:43 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Force10 View Post
Tell that to the folks that run XP and DX9. They got swindled, pure and simple.
Why have they? it seems to me the main hold up with the patch is to make sure the DX9 guys are looked after.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-23-2012, 07:24 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
Why have they? it seems to me the main hold up with the patch is to make sure the DX9 guys are looked after.
Because that kind of logic get in the way of thier agenda!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-23-2012, 07:36 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
Why have they? it seems to me the main hold up with the patch is to make sure the DX9 guys are looked after.
They dont give a hoot about the COD DX9 guys, DX9 has been pony from the start, they are only making sure DX9 is ok for the MMO.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-23-2012, 08:01 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
They dont give a hoot about the COD DX9 guys, DX9 has been pony from the start, they are only making sure DX9 is ok for the MMO.
Can you explain why exactly DX9 is essential for an MMO?
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-23-2012, 08:23 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
Can you explain why exactly DX9 is essential for an MMO?
I never said it was essential, im saying the DX9 fix is for the next release, the DX9 fix for COD is just a bi-product.
If they HAD to fix DX9 for COD because its on the box, it would have been done before release.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-23-2012, 08:25 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
I never said it was essential, im saying the DX9 fix is for the next release, the DX9 fix for COD is just a bi-product.
If they HAD to fix DX9 for COD because its on the box, it would have been done before release.
So why do they need to bother fixing DX9 at all then?
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Last edited by bongodriver; 06-23-2012 at 08:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-23-2012, 08:33 PM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver View Post
So why do they need to bother fixing DX9 at all then?

They need it fixed for the MMO, and they want to attract as many new blood players worldwide as possible. For the new game they need to reach for large player base, IMHO
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-23-2012, 08:39 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlipBall View Post
They need it fixed for the MMO, and they want to attract as many new blood players worldwide as possible. For the new game, IMHO
Well Furbs explained DX9 is 'not' essential for an MMO, he also said they didn't give enough of a crap about DX9 users to fix it, yet they are fixing it despite it not being essential which says they do give a crap about DX9 users.

Now people suggest they only give a crap about DX9 for sales of the sequel......so DX9 is essential for sales....so it makes sense to have it in COD too......they still wan't to sell it don't they.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:42 AM.


Contact Us - Fulqrum Publishing s.r.o. - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.