Is there an internal Testers / Beta Tester Group?

[SiThSpAwN]

Originally Posted by MadTommy

I'm all too aware we are all testers. Personally i don't want to be a tester. Of course I will happily submit bug reports that i find that have not already been found, however i don't have the time to troll through 100s of posts to do this efficiently.

Testing is optional, if you dont want to be a tester then dont install the patches until they are official.

[MadTommy]

Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN

Testing is optional, if you dont want to be a tester then dont install the patches until they are official.

That's a little black & white and disingenuous to be honest.

We all want the game to be running as good as possible, hence we will all try any patches, especially after waiting for 7 months or so to have severe problems fixed. The track record shows no matter what a patch is call, alpha, beta or official we still are very much still testing. No patch to date has been release without a plethora of issues still being present, ironically enough the alpha patch has been the best yet. which is nice, progress is being made.

But that is all rather off topic. I'm surprised there is no test team, as it sounds like there isn't.

[GraveyardJimmy]

Originally Posted by MadTommy

But that is all rather off topic. I'm surprised there is no test team, as it sounds like there isn't.

Blacksix has stated there is. Here are some quotes (since you ignored the last post I made to suit your agenda):

The testing is going good.

responsible for the parts of the patch that are fully tested and working

the current beta version of the patch didn't pass internal test and was sent back for revision.

Test is going well. We don't have CTD on our PCs.

It's going into wide internal testing today, which will last through the weekend and probably a couple of days more.

There are just a few which show they have an internal testing team, even if it is the developers themselves. You can find these yourself if you search posts by blacksix, it took less than 5 minutes.

[Blackdog_kt]

Actually i'm with Sith on this one. What you say effectively translates to "i want only the final patch".

Sith says "you have the option to not install the intermediate testing patches and wait for the final".

It doesn't make any difference whether the alpha is public or not: in both cases you don't install the alpha patch.

The fact that you can doesn't mean you have to, if it contradicts your wish not to test it.

In fact, the main differences between the two approaches (what we have and what you suggest) are:

1) with the current approach you have an option, with the one you suggest you don't and
2) public testing = more testers = statistically more probable for issues to be encountered = bugs get discovered faster.

I really don't see how this is worse than internal testing only.

[MadTommy]

Originally Posted by GraveyardJimmy

Blacksix has stated there is. Here are some quotes (since you ignored the last post I made to suit your agenda):

Jeeze chill out. I read your post and understand your view. Sorry i didn't quote you and caress your forum ego. My only agenda is thinking that a dedicated team of testers would help fix and find issues, why you are so hostile to this only you know.

Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt

Actually i'm with Sith on this one. What you say effectively translates to "i want only the final patch".

Sith says "you have the option to not install the intermediate testing patches and wait for the final".

It doesn't make any difference whether the alpha is public or not: in both cases you don't install the alpha patch.

The fact that you can doesn't mean you have to, if it contradicts your wish not to test it.

In fact, the main differences between the two approaches (what we have and what you suggest) are:

1) with the current approach you have an option, with the one you suggest you don't and
2) public testing = more testers = statistically more probable for issues to be encountered = bugs get discovered faster.

I really don't see how this is worse than internal testing only.

I think public beta testing is a good thing, but what is better is to have closed testing as well. I've been around the block, been involved in internal testing and such like in the past, its far for productive and focused than an open forum beta test, which serves a different purpose.

Having a volunteer, i.e not paid, team, testing specific changes to the game not only improves efficiency but relieves the developers from this work. The devs & testers share info on a closed forum under a NDA.. this is the kind of setup that I think could only benefit CloD...BS like 'don't download the patch if you don't want to test'.. is well BS.

[GraveyardJimmy]

Originally Posted by MadTommy

My only agenda is thinking that a dedicated team of testers would help fix and find issues, why you are so hostile to this only you know.

The point is the devs have stated there are patch tests including online patch tests. If you dont want to test, don't download the patch. After internal tests there are public tests as you suggest you know. The devs have repeatedly stated the patch is going into internal testing and that they do testing online. What we have now comes after their internal testing.

BS like 'don't download the patch if you don't want to test'.. is well BS.

How is that bad advice? If you don't want to risk being affected by bugs, dont take part in what is clearly labelled alpha/beta patches.

Same way some people don't join the RO2 public beta tests that are happening now. They are not mandatory.

Also, its nothing to do with being quoted, it's that the devs have responded to questions over whether they test online, when this was brought to your attention you ignored it saying "I'm surprised there is no test team, as it sounds like there isn't. ". Nothing to do with "forum ego" just you ignoring things that don't suit you, hence why I showed you some quotes from the devs that show there is a "test team".

[pstyle]

Originally Posted by MadTommy

Having a volunteer, i.e not paid, team, testing specific changes to the game not only improves efficiency but relieves the developers from this work. .

I think the recent open testing and crash-log submissions, resulting in a less-than-1 week turnaround in a hot-fix that is widely regarded by the community as having fixed the main issues (issues that were hanging around for 12 months or more) demonstrates how amazingly efficient the open source testing is.

Originally Posted by MadTommy

BS like 'don't download the patch if you don't want to test'.. is well BS.

Why is it BS?
The open source testing has been amazing for this game. Once the devs decided to collect crash dump data from the community their knowledge base went through the roof - and so did their ability to respond. So it's obvious that providing the patch to everyone who want's to help out, is a good, good thing. So, therefore it's here to stay...

No-one is forced to adopt the alphas/ hot fixes. They're not automatic updates, but freely downloadable. There are still servers online running the pre-patch versions. You opt-in to test.

And if people are not interested in being part of that testing process, then they need not.

[SiThSpAwN]

Originally Posted by MadTommy

Jeeze chill out. I read your post and understand your view. Sorry i didn't quote you and caress your forum ego. My only agenda is thinking that a dedicated team of testers would help fix and find issues, why you are so hostile to this only you know.



I think public beta testing is a good thing, but what is better is to have closed testing as well. I've been around the block, been involved in internal testing and such like in the past, its far for productive and focused than an open forum beta test, which serves a different purpose.

Having a volunteer, i.e not paid, team, testing specific changes to the game not only improves efficiency but relieves the developers from this work. The devs & testers share info on a closed forum under a NDA.. this is the kind of setup that I think could only benefit CloD...BS like 'don't download the patch if you don't want to test'.. is well BS.

If this game hadnt been released yet, and we were talking about testing for release I would expect them to do enternal testing with their team, then start inviting people in from the outside to test, much like many other games have done in the past.

BUT we are not before release we are a year into it. I and everyone else here have atleast 60 buck invested in this puppy, so an open Alpha/Beta of the new graphics engine is honestly expected on my part. If they were to do a closed testing session under an NDA the forums would just implode more so than they already have by people wearing tinfoil hats and screaming conspiracy.

And lets be honest, most closed Alpha/Beta testing is only moderately successful, when games go full release or full open beta thats when you start seeing the fixes, I think at the point this game is at, and what it needs as much quality info as it can get, open release testing is always going to get you more of that.

Maybe before BoM comes out, or before they release playable vehicles a closed testing session should be considered, or they start adding a volunteer testing team from the community that will see releases in the future before general release, but I think they are approaching this current situation in the best possible way right now.

Imagine these forums if only a handful of players had seen the recent patch/hotfix? Now imagine the patch/hotfix without the amount of data they have collected because the only had a handful of people testing...

[Blackdog_kt]

Originally Posted by MadTommy

Jeeze chill out. I read your post and understand your view. Sorry i didn't quote you and caress your forum ego. My only agenda is thinking that a dedicated team of testers would help fix and find issues, why you are so hostile to this only you know.



I think public beta testing is a good thing, but what is better is to have closed testing as well. I've been around the block, been involved in internal testing and such like in the past, its far for productive and focused than an open forum beta test, which serves a different purpose.

Having a volunteer, i.e not paid, team, testing specific changes to the game not only improves efficiency but relieves the developers from this work. The devs & testers share info on a closed forum under a NDA.. this is the kind of setup that I think could only benefit CloD...BS like 'don't download the patch if you don't want to test'.. is well BS.

It's certainly not BS when you've been clearly informed beforehand that it's a test patch and not a final "fix X issue" patch: the purpose is to try things out in the code in order to pick the best solution and some of those things, well, they will not work. And that's how they get to pick the solution, by getting feedback about what doesn't work during testing.

It's not something we install to go fly for 10 hours on multiplayer. The fact that many do so without problems is not because that is the purpose of the testing patch, but just a side effect of it working well on their systems.

I agree on some of your other points though.
Internal testing is good for a simple reason: dedicated testers and focused feedback.
Public testing has a harder to evaluate feedback range, but it has the advantage of a larger sample pool.

I think having both is the way to go and by the looks of it, that's what we have currently.

Also, what Sith said (again).

[MadTommy]

Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt

It's certainly not BS .

I meant it BS in regards to the subject of this thread..