Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:38 PM
RegRag1977 RegRag1977 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 139
Thumbs up We definitely need something like this!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aviar View Post
Let me add a little bit more info to stovak's excellent post earlier.

The first screenshot below shows IL-2 in it's native 4:3 aspect ratio. Notice the infamous 'black bars' you get if you play on a widescreen monitor:





The second screenshot below shows IL-2 in (untrue) 'widescreen'. This is what you get if you edit your conf file to 'fill' the entire screen of your widscreen monitor. There are two major points to look at here.

First, look at the HORIZONTAL FOV. It is exactly the same as the 4:3 FOV. This is why people say it is not 'true' widescreen. You do not get a wider FOV as you would in 'true' widescreen. All you get is a screen that is 'stretched' horizontally (so it 'fills' the entire screen of your widescreen monitor).

Additionally, one negative aspect of this 'stretching' is that round objects such as dials/guages will appear slightly oval shaped. (Easier seen on a bigger screen.) Indeed, everything on your screen will be stretched horizontally.

Secondly, look at the VERTICAL FOV. You are actually LOSING FOV (compared to 4:3 native). It may not be a lot, but this is what bothers some people. In 'true' widescreen, you would not lose any FOV. In fact, you would actually INCREASE your FOV. (Thus the term 'true'.)

*There is one more factor to consider. These screenshots were taken on a 16:10 monitor. Many people nowadays use a 16:9 monitor. If you use a 16:9 monitor and implement the (untrue) 'widescreen' option, your vertical FOV will be even LESS than on a 16:10 monitor. Just something to be aware of.





Those two screenshots basically sum up the entire issue. However, I will show you one more. I suspect many players do not know what IL-2 would look like in 'true' widescreen.

The third screenshot below is IL-2 in 'true' widescreen on a 16:10 monitor. Notice the INCREASED horizontal FOV as well as the INCREASED vertical FOV. This is what players are asking for when they request natively supported 'true' widescreen.





Aviar
+1

True widescreen would be so nice indeed )

Late war P47 razorback and Ki44 would also be nice...

Last edited by RegRag1977; 05-14-2012 at 07:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-14-2012, 07:59 PM
Mysticpuma's Avatar
Mysticpuma Mysticpuma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bromsgrove, UK
Posts: 1,059
Default

More than one frame of animation to show that static vehicles/aircraft have been destroyed?

Could we have maybe 5-10 frames to show destruction?

Currently static aircraft are fine, then next-frame smouldering wrecks


Could we also have smoke effects rather than the 2D sprite (looks like a row of stripes) effect?

Also is it possible that Locomotives can sustain damage and produce steam rather than the one frame animation and dead-stop in tracks?

Cheers, MP
__________________
http://i41.tinypic.com/2yjr679.png
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-14-2012, 08:09 PM
RegRag1977 RegRag1977 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 139
Unhappy MiG3 is the worst looking plane ingame

MiG3 desperately needs a new 3D model and a new pit: this ac is often forgotten, but many have come to love it very much. Please try to do smthg for this one too, it really deserves it!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-14-2012, 08:26 PM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

As much as i love the plane, could we have P38's that can't fly for ever with an engine on fire?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-14-2012, 10:24 PM
llama_thumper's Avatar
llama_thumper llama_thumper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Default visual animation bug with twin eng planes

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=29282

this has been posted and acknowledged before, but, for good order and to have things in one place, i'm posting it here in the 4.12 wishlist thread - as per the above link, there's a bug that doesn't correctly, in multiplayer, display on/off state of engines. would be great if this could get fixed in 4.12.
__________________


i7-2600K @ 3.4GHz processor with Corsair H80 liquid cooling
AMD Radeon HD6990 4GB graphics card
8GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 SDRAM @ 1600Mhz
Kingston SSD 64GB SNV425S2 hard disk
MSI Z68A-GD80 mainboard
Win7 64 Pro operating system
Logitech G940 flight control system

Cliffs of Dover FPS: TBD
ATI Catalyst driver version: 12.2
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-15-2012, 05:58 AM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

[QUOTE=P-38L;425655]Hello to all of you.

In early developments, 1C start creating a cockpit will all realism in damage. I am talking about the P-38 Lightning, but we never saw the updated.



I think this is one of the only cockpits that does not have this kind of realism.

Perhaps you can add it.

And dont forget the R/R/R (Rearm, Refuel, Repair) option. Is one of the important items in the game.

Thank you.[/QUOTEA

P-38 Lightning with a Gyro-Sight? Which version is this for?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-15-2012, 09:17 AM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-38L View Post
In early developments, 1C start creating a cockpit will all realism in damage. I am talking about the P-38 Lightning, but we never saw the updated.
What do you mean with 'all realism damage' ? The only difference, that I see, is the additional glassholes on the armor screen.
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-17-2012, 05:40 PM
Rot Bourratif Rot Bourratif is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 22
Default

I fail to see any realism in repairing any A/C with battle damage in the time span of one online battle...

For example, how long do you think it would take to dismount an engine, inspect it, repair it if repairable and replace it in position?

http://www.asisbiz.com/il2/Bf-109E/B...e-1940-01.html

Oh well...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-14-2012, 10:25 PM
Fenrir's Avatar
Fenrir Fenrir is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fruitbat View Post
As much as i love the plane, could we have P38's that can't fly for ever with an engine on fire?
+1. Can we have F, G & H variants too? The Slot map feels so incomplete without them...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.