Friday Update, February 10, 2012

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by icarus

Just as long as they fix CoD's multiple major problems first, then its no issue at all.

First?

Well that depends, I would agree if the team members doing the AAA could be working on the bugs..

But based on what Luther said, that is not allays the case.

Therefore if the team members who did the AAA can not help in fixing the bugs, and have no aircraft oriented things to work on, than I think it is a good idea to have them doing the AAA as opposed to doing nothing at all.

[icarus]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

First?

Well that depends, I would agree if the team members doing the AAA could be working on the bugs..

But based on what Luther said, that is not allays the case.

Therefore if the team members who did the AAA can not help in fixing the bugs, and have no aircraft oriented things to work on, than I think it is a good idea to have them doing the AAA as opposed to doing nothing at all.

Wow! I agree with your comment 100% and you still find a way to split haiirs in order to start an argument. Pathetic obsessed arguing deserves a ban.

I will clarify for those who need help. Replace "first" with ""as their first priority" T

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by icarus

Wow! I agree with your comment 100%

S!

Originally Posted by icarus

and you still find a way to split haiirs in order to start an argument. Pathetic obsessed arguing deserves a ban.

Really?

So, pointing out the facts oh what Luither said with regards to fixing bugs is spliting hairs and starting an argument?

You do have a strange view of the CoD world IMHO..

May I make a recomendation that you put me on ignore? Because you allways seem to get upset with anything I say.

[Tavingon]

More planes!

[icarus]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

S!


Really?

So, pointing out the facts oh what Luither said with regards to fixing bugs is spliting hairs and starting an argument?

You do have a strange view of the CoD world IMHO..

May I make a recomendation that you put me on ignore? Because you allways seem to get upset with anything I say.

Yes REALLY! Dude read my clarification. It explains why your quote is unnecessary and irrelevent:

I will clarify for you. Replace "first" with ""as their first priority" It does not mean they can't do anything else as long as their first priority is fixing the multiple major problems with CoD. Sheesh!

[bongodriver]

Originally Posted by icarus

Yes REALLY! Dude read my clarification. It explains why your quote is unnecessary and irrelevent:

I will clarify for you. Replace "first" with ""as their first priority" It does not mean they can't do anything else as long as their first priority is fixing the multiple major problems with CoD. Sheesh!

Does anything give you the impression it's not their first priority?

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by icarus

Dude read my clarification. It explains why your quote is unnecessary and irrelevent:

Just to be clear, your clarification came after my initial response that you got so upset about.. Thus not relevant

As for my replies in response to your replies to me

It is quite simple..

Don't reply/respond to something I said if you are incapable of accepting my 'point of view' when I reply 'back' to you

Now since you refuse to put me on ignore..

And insist on trying to make this into something it is not..

Know that I for one am going to take the high road here and not muddy up this thread anymore by playing tit for tat with you in public..

From this point forward in this thread I will simply respond to you by saying 'see PM'

Will that make you happy?

[dcart]

In when the Sim's in the battle of England ? Lol !
In the battle of Moscow shall we have the possibility of interpreting the role of a Soviet farmer, his doubts and his fears at the approach of the period of the harvests?

[icarus]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

Just to be clear, your clarification came after my initial response that you got so upset about.. Thus not relevant

As for my replies in response to your replies to me

It is quite simple..

Don't reply/respond to something I said if you are incapable of accepting my 'point of view' when I reply 'back' to you

Now since you refuse to put me on ignore..

And insist on trying to make this into something it is not..

Know that I for one am going to take the high road here and not muddy up this thread anymore by playing tit for tat with you in public..

From this point forward in this thread I will simply respond to you by saying 'see PM'

Will that make you happy?

Wow, I thought I was taking the high road agreeing with you 100%. Sorry for trying to agree with you and not arguing.

No do not PM me I do not want to take it to another level with you spamming my email with notifications.