4-12 wish list (Merged)

[dFrog]

Originally Posted by Lagarto

most early P-51Ds were retrofitted with filets, and very few flew without them

Yes, they were. But this could be a sort of a "cosmetic change". Just take a B or C fin filet and add it to D-5. For a visual difference. It will take a 1 minute of work...

[II/JG54_Emil]

Engine sounds from the original engines would be great.

[CoolHand1970]

Thanks to your team for all their great work.

Have to agree on new sounds.

A flyable P-61 Black Widow would make this the best flight sim ever.

Better effects... Smoke and flames...

[Luno13]

Since you seems to be new, I'll go ahead and say it (this horse has been beaten to death )

Daidalos Team and 1C are contractually obliged to not include any hardware that was designed by Northrup-Grumman or any company it bought over the years.

This means no P-61, no Avengers, no further US battleships, and no further Wildcat and Hellcat variants, etc, etc, etc.

It's unfortunate, but there's nothing that can be done about it at this point except to try mods. It looks like World of Planes which will come out fairly soon will have an Avenger at least, but that game, produced by the guys who made Wings of Prey, is likely to have simpler physics, flight-model and damage-model than Il-2. (Pick your poison )

[CoolHand1970]

My bad, somewhere in the back of my mind, I knew this. I am not new to the game, just recently reinstalled after a few years. Trying to catch up on the latest and enjoying the sim very much. Don't know why I ever removed it... S!

[SPAD-1949]

Originally Posted by Luno13

Since you seems to be new, I'll go ahead and say it (this horse has been beaten to death )

Daidalos Team and 1C are contractually obliged to not include any hardware that was designed by Northrup-Grumman or any company it bought over the years.

This means no P-61, no Avengers, no further US battleships, and no further Wildcat and Hellcat variants, etc, etc, etc.

Impossible or just a matter of what price?

[csThor]

The former ... because of the latter.

[Daniël]

Hello, in this tread http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=29683 is a conversation about tank damage, which is very simple right now.
I think it would be a good idea to split the damage in two parts, without making the damage model too complex: Damage to the armour and damage to the tracks.
When the armour is destroyed, the whole tank is destroyed, but in some cases it is hard to do. When the tracks are destroyed the tank is useless and I think tracks were much easier to destroy than armour.

What do you think?

[Fighterace]

Originally Posted by csThor

The former ... because of the latter.

Is like millions of dollars that NG wants for licensing?

[SPAD-1949]

Originally Posted by csThor

The former ... because of the latter.

I thought so...
Any hint about the ammount?