Long live il2 series

Originally Posted by adonys

obviously, any reasoning, no matter how logic, must bow before the reality's cruel truth..

PS: i think you've missed the third reason which could make customers happy enough

I agree that no more words will make anyone here happy anymore... Majority just want to see fixes of bugs reported and classified as urgent by THEM. Next one is - as soon as possible.
I think that last rebellion here was based on perception that nobody in MG really care what they say or want or even bother to communicate with them. This is absolutely understandable. At least for me. Because I understand also, that the most important subject here are customers, it is the central point around everything else should move. At least in my business model.

OK, let's say - to be positive - that plan currently (as this makes only sense to me) - the real plan, is to make Battle of Moscow as soon as possible and focus only on that - in this Addon the most of critical bugs will be repaired. But nobody will care anymore about BOB in this phase... Or, if they are not dependent on the sales revenues, as they can have some sponsor in golden mine owner from Siberia, they will fiddle and mess around with BOB only for the rest of this year...

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by Opitz

OK, let's say - to be positive - that plan currently (as this makes only sense to me) - the real plan, is to make Battle of Moscow as soon as possible and focus only on that - in this Addon the most of critical bugs will be repaired. But nobody will care anymore about BOB in this phase... Or, if they are not dependent on the sales revenues, as they can have some sponsor in golden mine owner from Siberia, they will fiddle and mess around with BOB only for the rest of this year...

You fly other IL-2 titles?

If so, your statement above are really poor. All IL-2 titles are INTEGRATED. MG will not "abandon" CloD for Battle of Moscow...

You really need to be quiet and stop the nonsense. Battle of Moscow will use the same engine as CloD. "Focus" in Battle of Moscow is "focus" in CloD.

I believe this is obvious. But as far I can see, isn't to some...

[JG53Frankyboy]

Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM

You fly other IL-2 titles?

If so, your statement above are really poor. All IL-2 titles are INTEGRATED. MG will not "abandon" CloD for Battle of Moscow...

You really need to be quiet and stop the nonsense. Battle of Moscow will use the same engine as CloD. "Focus" in Battle of Moscow is "focus" in CloD.

I believe this is obvious. But as far I can see, isn't to some...

totaly true, if the Moskau AdOn will be mergable with CoD the main gameengine/GUI issues might be fixed.
Lets hope for the smaller, but still annyoing bugs for the 'typical' BoB planes...........

I just can remember that Oleg said years ago that making Pacific Fighters mergable was not easy - and he wished he had not to do so. Lukily he did


I also belive, the main plan is to work on the EasternFront adon, fix the engine and make it mergable. But actually we dont know.

[carguy_]

Originally Posted by adonys

obviously, any reasoning, no matter how logic, must bow before the reality's cruel truth..

Truth?

You mean FACTS? You never gave any.

You mean whiner-fabricated truth? I wholeheartedly agree.

[carguy_]

Originally Posted by adonys

The current customers were profoundly unstatisfied with the release state, generally not satisfied with the current state of the game nor with the pace of developer's fixing the sale-advertised/minimum game necessary broken systems nor with the lack of constant communication regarding the fixing progress.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but you don`t represent the customers. No one has given you a voice for this. Please do not post false information. We have many satisfied customers too.

The developers can't change the current game's state over night, nor increase the fixing pace..

Glad you finally came to understand that 4 months after release.

So, what simple logic tells you is the solution to make current customers happy enough in order to secure future sales (and eventually fullfil the potential of the game in order to widen the potential-customers area)?!!

Actually, many posts including the most recent ones by American customers show that many people do not transform into screaming brats overnight. Some poeple actually remember what 1C did with IL2 and they also give them some more time. Further development of this particular title can never be a part of your negative only contribution here.

[carguy_]

Originally Posted by Opitz

Because the real potential is missed by miles... And no miracle happened during US release. And it is quite hard to swallow for almost everyone here...

There you have it.
Whiners demanding miracles flat out.
Wrong again. This game is fulfilling its potential but you don`t seem to appreciate it and trying to diminish it. You will not succeed.

Originally Posted by carguy_

There you have it.
Whiners demanding miracles flat out.
Wrong again. This game is fulfilling its potential but you don`t seem to appreciate it and trying to diminish it. You will not succeed.

If that so, why there is such poor sales there now? Why the old customers are not coming back? Why there is only 22 ppl playing it online in "primetime"?

It is not about me or you, you didn't get it yet, right? How ridiculous is your "You will not succeed"...

If you, I mean YOU, enjoy this game in current state - I think this say a lot...

[carguy_]

Originally Posted by Opitz

If that so, why there is such poor sales there now? Why the old customers are not coming back? Why there is only 22 ppl playing it online in "primetime"?

Poor sales. Ok. Tell me why you think they are poor and what data do you have to judge it as poor?

The ridiculous statement with mp session numbers has been explained by other posters before and proves nothing.

Originally Posted by carguy_

Poor sales. Ok. Tell me why you think they are poor and what data do you have to judge it as poor?

The ridiculous statement with mp session numbers has been explained by other posters before and proves nothing.

So because the sales were so high or as planned, you can buy it with discounts now on many different sites and shops, right? Except Steam...

What about reviews from official games site or tv shows? Did they say in unissono - man this is a gem, go and buy it? Some even couldn't make a review!!!

So let's turn it around - why do you think sales are not poor? How you know?

[carguy_]

Originally Posted by Opitz

So because the sales were so high or as planned, you can buy it with discounts now on many different sites and shops, right? Except Steam...

Every single game gets a discount offer here or there after 4 months from release. Puuuuhleeeze!

What about reviews from official games site or tv shows? Did they say in unissono - man this is a gem, go and buy it? Some even couldn't make a review!!!

All of the reviews I read was : it is not working as it should right now so wait a little before you buy. The patches are coming as 1C provides excellent customer support. This is a rough gem which will shine in the future.
Sounds nothing like one sided - negative face you want to paste it.

So let's turn it around - why do you think sales are not poor? How you know?

No turning around. You made a statement of poor sales and reviews so you`re the one to prove it.