Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-09-2011, 05:39 PM
PE_Tihi PE_Tihi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImpalerNL View Post
Since you havent have flown a real spitfire, talking about its FM stability is the last thing you should do. If you feel that the current spitfire is as unstable as a leaf, i strongly suggest you practice more. If you fly a 4.10 spitfire and compare it with the FM stability of a p40,p51,p39 etc., there is nothing to complain about. Flying any aircraft on the edge requires skill, and the spitfire isnt an exception.
I would be repeating myself if I answer- please see my other posts here.

If you cant find any difference in the stability between the planes you mention and the new Spit, than you probably haven't been flying here long enough.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-09-2011, 08:10 PM
ImpalerNL ImpalerNL is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PE_Tihi View Post
I would be repeating myself if I answer- please see my other posts here.

If you cant find any difference in the stability between the planes you mention and the new Spit, than you probably haven't been flying here long enough.
Because i dont fly enough i cant notice difference between aircraft?
Ive been flying il2 for 5 years. The spitfire already outclimbs and outturns the LW fighters, but you dont agree with a bit more lively FM?

Last edited by ImpalerNL; 02-09-2011 at 08:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-2011, 08:36 PM
Hawker17 Hawker17 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 32
Default

I agree with PE_Tihi, the Spit has become a very nervous instable platform, in constant need of elevator trim.

In no way realistic. It was generally only needed to trim elevator during cruise.

I'm sure this will be solved in future. The Sputterfire will be a Spitfire again.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2011, 10:30 PM
PE_Tihi PE_Tihi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImpalerNL View Post
Because i dont fly enough i cant notice difference between aircraft?
Ive been flying il2 for 5 years. The spitfire already outclimbs and outturns the LW fighters, but you dont agree with a bit more lively FM?
Well obviously you haven't flown it enough. Try flying some years more, maybe you ll notice it then.

Spit always outturned the LW fighters. Outclimbing LW? Stay away from 25Lbs Servers like I do.

Lively FM? Joker, arent you?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-10-2011, 06:50 AM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Fly 400 km/h IAS at 1000m alt. Trim the aircraft for level flight. Shortly apply rudder for 15° of slip and release. Try with a Spitfire of your choice, a Fw 190, an F6F and a P-51.

How often does each plane go back and forth before it stops oscillating?
How large is the first amplitude to the other side for each plane?
How much time is needed for each plane to settle back to a steady condition?

Do that and you'll see that the Spitfire is just as stable as other planes, it simply has more effective controls. It is possible to compensate for that with a proper joystick set-up or simply by being less ham-fisted.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-10-2011, 03:53 PM
PE_Tihi PE_Tihi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JtD View Post
Fly 400 km/h IAS at 1000m alt. Trim the aircraft for level flight. Shortly apply rudder for 15° of slip and release. Try with a Spitfire of your choice, a Fw 190, an F6F and a P-51.

How often does each plane go back and forth before it stops oscillating?
How large is the first amplitude to the other side for each plane?
How much time is needed for each plane to settle back to a steady condition?

Do that and you'll see that the Spitfire is just as stable as other planes, it simply has more effective controls. It is possible to compensate for that with a proper joystick set-up or simply by being less ham-fisted.
You been testing the thing a bit wrongly, my dear. Wouldn't you expect the damping to be stronger and work faster at high speeds, hmm? So why did you test at 400 km/h, ehh?

Point the planes nose vertically upwards, and wait till the speed drops to about 100 kmh, then and kick the rudder to help the nose start falling down. Then tell me later will it fall. Let the plane climb further (you ll have no other choice, anyway) to zero speed. Then later, if you still feel like it, tell me how did your hammerhead look like? Now try the same with any other plane, or the 409 spit, for a comparison.

Call me ham-fisted, huh? A good pal of mine, called ham, could hit at 700 m almost at will and any deflection His flying was not worse. Well, it is from him that I learned most, so i may even be a bit ham-fisted, too, but I think you wouldnt find it that agreeable, flying for my opponents

Last edited by PE_Tihi; 02-10-2011 at 04:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.