Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-22-2010, 08:49 PM
Friendly_flyer's Avatar
Friendly_flyer Friendly_flyer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 412
Default

I am very, very impressed! It seems TD has put in a lot of little nuggets for the connoisseur. Personally I am very excited about the improved Mistel! Now is the time to fire up those hair-raising anti ship missions again!
__________________
Fly friendly!



Visit No 79 Squadron vRAF

Petter Bøckman
Norway
  #2  
Old 12-22-2010, 09:00 PM
Wutz Wutz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by addman View Post
Hey! don't excuse yourself. There are plenty of planes in IL-2 that didn't even leave the drawing board. The "Nell" played important parts in both China and the Pacific. I also love the G4M and the only plane I look forward to in 4.10 is the Hs-129.
I know, but before we see a bird like that, we will have the 5000th version of the Spitfire and a simular number of Bf 109s as fighters won the war.
  #3  
Old 12-23-2010, 01:59 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wutz View Post
I know, but before we see a bird like that, we will have the 5000th version of the Spitfire and a simular number of Bf 109s as fighters won the war.
It's "easy" to introduce a new set of numbers into a FM to add a few more variations to aircraft already present in-game. It's quite another thing to model a bomber with multiple stations.

Some folks don't realize but both online and offline the different variations of Spitfires, Yaks, 109s, 190s and the like are important for historical scenarios as well as for balancing online interactions. Quite a bit of value for comparatively little effort.

It's the same sort of comments that we saw when aircraft like the Yak-7B, 1942 or the Yak-9M or the FW190A-6 were added to the game. Adding these didn't take away from getting a new attack aircraft or bomber and that is what is often implied unfortunately. Not sure if that is the case here or not.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
  #4  
Old 12-23-2010, 04:04 AM
BadAim BadAim is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 984
Default

I get the impression that I'm gonna' like this a lot. Tanks for all the hard work boys!
  #5  
Old 12-23-2010, 06:21 AM
dflion dflion is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 319
Smile 4.10m User Guide

Well done Team Daidalos. Have just finishing reading the guide which is very comprehensive and shows how much work you have all done - no wonder there was a substantial delay.
I particularly like the changes to the QMB and FMB. The FMB selection of group listed objects will be a great time saver.
I can't wait to get my hands on the new Spitfire variant updates - I have a lot mission updating to do with with these better looking and flying Spits.
I am also very happy to see a Dornier bomber finally in the flight sim, even though at this stage it is only AI.
There are many excellent changes that will make all the aircraft more immersive to fly and create more realistic FMB missions.
Hope you can deliver us all a Christmas present very soon?
Happy Christmas to you all.
DFLion
  #6  
Old 12-23-2010, 10:58 AM
Wutz Wutz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
It's "easy" to introduce a new set of numbers into a FM to add a few more variations to aircraft already present in-game. It's quite another thing to model a bomber with multiple stations.

Some folks don't realize but both online and offline the different variations of Spitfires, Yaks, 109s, 190s and the like are important for historical scenarios as well as for balancing online interactions. Quite a bit of value for comparatively little effort.

It's the same sort of comments that we saw when aircraft like the Yak-7B, 1942 or the Yak-9M or the FW190A-6 were added to the game. Adding these didn't take away from getting a new attack aircraft or bomber and that is what is often implied unfortunately. Not sure if that is the case here or not.
Well until IL2 came out every flight sim was a Spits and 109s orgie, IL2 was the first enjoyable exception bringing Russian planes to the screen, that you never got to see anywhere else. But now with the patches we are heading in a direction of sims like EAW and simular, Spits and 109 orgies again. Maybe I am just a old pessimistic grump, but you do have sometimes a feeling 99% of the planes that flew during WWII can be dropped under the table as long as there are Spits & 109s.
And yes I am a mainly online flier but I don´t give a hoot for furball flights, they are as interesting as doing the dishes.
In the Pacific theatre there are such big gaps that one can hardly make any realistic missions, at all. We have exactly two Japanese bombers that are flyable, and both are Japanese navy bombers so missions where the army was involved are no goes, unless historical details are of next to no real interest.
Well I am hoping for SoW but not putting my hopes too high, as I expect with SoW another serving of what we have seen with every other flight sim that has reached the market, only with a lot more details.
  #7  
Old 12-23-2010, 11:34 AM
TeeJay82 TeeJay82 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Siljan, Norway
Posts: 233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wutz View Post
Well until IL2 came out every flight sim was a Spits and 109s orgie, IL2 was the first enjoyable exception bringing Russian planes to the screen, that you never got to see anywhere else. But now with the patches we are heading in a direction of sims like EAW and simular, Spits and 109 orgies again. Maybe I am just a old pessimistic grump, but you do have sometimes a feeling 99% of the planes that flew during WWII can be dropped under the table as long as there are Spits & 109s.
And yes I am a mainly online flier but I don´t give a hoot for furball flights, they are as interesting as doing the dishes.
In the Pacific theatre there are such big gaps that one can hardly make any realistic missions, at all. We have exactly two Japanese bombers that are flyable, and both are Japanese navy bombers so missions where the army was involved are no goes, unless historical details are of next to no real interest.
Well I am hoping for SoW but not putting my hopes too high, as I expect with SoW another serving of what we have seen with every other flight sim that has reached the market, only with a lot more details.
w00t? there have never been more flyables in a ww2 air sim.

what you focus on is up to you
and apparantly its the spits and me109
  #8  
Old 12-23-2010, 11:42 AM
Wutz Wutz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TeeJay82 View Post
w00t? there have never been more flyables in a ww2 air sim.

what you focus on is up to you
and apparantly its the spits and me109
If you had read my post correctly I never denyied that we had many flyables. But of those many how many are really used on servers? I think if one is optimistic a good 30% you will never see, even though we have them.

I was just stating that the main attention does seem to be going towards the furballers and less towards the mission friends.
But that is just my opinion, and I do believe I may voice it, just like everyone else?
  #9  
Old 12-23-2010, 12:28 PM
Avimimus Avimimus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 803
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wutz View Post
Well until IL2 came out every flight sim was a Spits and 109s orgie, IL2 was the first enjoyable exception bringing Russian planes to the screen, that you never got to see anywhere else. But now with the patches we are heading in a direction of sims like EAW and simular, Spits and 109 orgies again. Maybe I am just a old pessimistic grump, but you do have sometimes a feeling 99% of the planes that flew during WWII can be dropped under the table as long as there are Spits & 109s.
I actually agree with this - by the time I got a fast enough connection to fly online all the dogfight servers had gone later war (and often western front). I'm simply not one to enjoy La-7 + Ki-84 + P-51 + Spit IX duels. I like maneuvering combat without many cannons.

So, I don't fly online (as I don't have the time for co-op). I'm hopeful that MDS will open up a more mission oriented dogfight server.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.