More severe moderation in update threads?

[Osprey]

Somebody that hasn't got time for moderating shouldn't be a moderator at all. There's nothing worse than a lazy mod who isn't interested in reason and just hits ban because they can. Those types usually have people leave in droves.

"Off with their heads"

[SlipBall]

Originally Posted by nearmiss

Just remove postings...you say

Deletion of postings should not be required.

Most of the members on this boards are adults.

In tune with the requests on this thread. The coming update thread will be more severely enforced. No big deal, 1 week bans to members posting off topic - first offense. It will not matter if you have been a member of this board for 3 years and have a good record. OFF TOPIC IS OFF TOPIC, no warnings.

The current update thread is locked because of all the OFF TOPIC postings.

Report OFF TOPIC POSTINGS when you see them. Moderators can't read every posting 24/7.

Thanks

nearmiss

I believe that the problem has more to do with the number of posts some people make in the up-date thread. Same people each week, 70, 80, 90. posts (from each of them) in the thread. That's the clutter...I don't think you should ban someone if he strays a bit off topic. Give this a little thought

[philip.ed]

What if all the posts are relevent? In any sense, such numbers of postings can just be a result of the thread going O/T, and when the thread stays on topic this never happens.

[SlipBall]

Originally Posted by philip.ed

What if all the posts are relevent? In any sense, such numbers of postings can just be a result of the thread going O/T, and when the thread stays on topic this never happens.

Yes philip, you are one of those people that I mentioned or was referring to. I believe that you mean well, and do bring a bit to the table. But I must tell you though, that you post so often, that I just skip over your posts.

[philip.ed]

I wasn't refuting that, but then again most of those posts were in response to people arguing against my opinion. My point is that, looking at this weeks topic, I only posted a few times and all my posts were related to the update. The idea was to stay on topic, and because no-one started any arguments it stayed that way.
The past is behind us, now. We should look to the future

[KOM.Nausicaa]

Well, 48 hours after I made this thread the percentage of people expressing their wish for more moderation was already at 74%. That is a large majority, and ever since it has stayed at around 70%. It can't be made any clearer that many people are frustrated with the way most update threads turn. It took another update thread going down the drain for the mods to realize the issue was real and serious for many here. I am happy they take actions now.

Having been moderator and admin on other forums in the past I would recommend first and forall that mods make themselves easier to indentify. There should be something in their avatar or signature. Personally I just know Nearmiss for example. If there is another one I have failed to recognize him/her. That is already a problem.

Second, people should be warned progressively and clearly visible in their own posts with fat red moderator letters if needed. Then, in steps, 3 days "in the box", 1 week, one month, and finally permanent ban. Sentences like "that terrain looks like painted by a child with watercolors" for example is enough for a first 3 days in the box. That is my personal opinion.

Third, I think we need more moderators. This forum is very active and fast paced by times.
No way 1-2 mods can make the job which is needed. I think it needs at least 4, better 5, best in different time zones, so there is a chance there is always someone around.

[BK_JG27_Treiber]

Originally Posted by KOM.Nausicaa

Third, I think we need more moderators. This forum is very active and fast paced by times.
No way 1-2 mods can make the job which is needed. I think it needs at least 4, better 5, best in different time zones, so there is a chance there is always someone around.

Therein lies the primary problem, IMO. Good idea. I'd nominate Oleg himself if he had the time.

[major_setback]

I always find it ridiculous that aggravating posters aren't banned for several weeks.
I'm sure that no-one really would care if such a small penalty was dealt out.
Ban me if you disagree!! I really couldn't care any less.

I'll be back in a few weeks if I feel like it.

Really; just put a lock on anyone who is getting away from the topic.

Please!

[McHilt]

OT posts are annoying, but one has to be realistic. Everybody posts a couple of OT lines every now and then, like a joke or sth else irrelevant to the actual subject. I have no prob with that at all. Personally I hate all the whining and wishlists, but I also hate posts that could make up a short novel and take 20 mins to plow through, even if they're on topic they're annoying just as well in my humble opinion.

I'd say: stick to the subject, crack an OT joke every now and then, keep it short and simple, stop whining and wishing and enjoy what's given by the great Oleg and team, even if you don't like it...

and yes, real spam = ban

[Rodolphe]

...

Originally Posted by KOM.Nausicaa

Second, people should be warned progressively and clearly visible in their own posts with fat red moderator letters if needed. Then, in steps, 3 days "in the box", 1 week, one month, and finally permanent ban. Sentences like "that terrain looks like painted by a child with watercolors" for example is enough for a first 3 days in the box. That is my personal opinion.

KOM.Nausicaa, I really like to know what's your personal opinion and your proposal ban for the following typical rude, insulting The Community and most racist posting I've ever seen on a simulation forum.

Originally Posted by Nausicaa

Well, I read all that, but I rest my case. It really bla bla, without interest, like "I'm the arrogant French and German is an asshole anyway."

Fuc*k you ... frenchie!

That's it for me - I found this forum really extremely unpleasant arrogant. Very French (so to speak.)

Hello guys bye bye.

http://www.checksix-forums.com/showp...&postcount=980


Edit : Spelling
...