![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If Oleg can tap into the MS study sim brigade as well as the growing IL2 fan base then sales should be strong for the new title. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
SoW will capture the whole flight-sim market, and from what I've heard from other people, many others might be inspired too. Whether you like to admit it, graphics does draw many people into games and SoW just looks wonderful. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think the reflections in the instruments should be of the player. You take various pictures of yourself with different expressions that reflect the mood according to the situation. Just shot down a fellow, a grin. Missed a shot, disappointed. Someone on your 6, scared. Looking into the sun, squinting. Needing to take a piss, yellow eyes. Out of ammo, angry, or angry and SCARED!!! if someone is on your 6. Explosions should be so loud that you get a hearing loss and if you get shot down over enemy territory, you should not be allowed to fly again until you have been through a survival-camp for at least 2 months. One should be required to play the game, sorry simulate the BOB, in the shower so that if you ditch the shower is turned on automatically, full cool. Forget getting out within at least 30 minutes. The computer we are playing SOW on, sorry again, SIMULATING on, should be hooked up to a termometer. If it shows a temperature above freezing in the room, sorry the cockpit mock-up, you are sitting in, a warning will sound if you attempt to climb above freezing-level so that you can get into the freezer before you climb any further. All this is essential to a game, sorry again again, a SIMULATOR if it want's to have any credibility what so ever. Oleg, I hope you hear me!
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I hope my eaerlier comment didn't sound too harsh either |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Even if MS come up with FSXI they will not be able to compete when it comes to the General Aircraft market especially if we see third-party releases including non-combat and modern aircraft (and considering that third-parties will have the possibility to make their own small maps). I wonder how well it will work as a train sim..I imagine it will be very simplified though, otherwise that would be another nice market. I could just imagine the frustration of online train simmers, constantly being harassed by pesky dive bombers!
__________________
All CoD screenshots here: http://s58.photobucket.com/albums/g260/restranger/ __________ ![]() Flying online as Setback. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
quote
Even if MS come up with FSXI they will not be able to compete when it comes to the General Aircraft market If the SU-26 is in the release, look then for MS to loose many followers rather quickly
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't dream, the force of MSFS is the world-wide base of maps, apart thant the thousands of add-ons for long-courrier flights aficionados.
Given the higher quality of the terrain, I'm afraid that SoW will have a very long way to go to reach such a huge square mileage of maps. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Apples and oranges isn't it really?
As I have said many times, MSFS in it's countless variations is not a flight sim. It's a flight procedure simulator. A very different market indeed than a combat flight simulation. I doubt that any of the wannabe ATCs and trans Atlantic "pilots" in the Microsoft product have any clue what a proper FM or DM is, nor do they care. It's all about the procedure of flying, following the script (flight plan) of their "flight" to the letter is what is important to them. The cattle car driver's viewpoint is very different than ours is. Where SoW can make inroads into the "civilian" flight sim market will be in aerobatic flying and virtual air racing. Both of which depend a lot on proper modeling of the aircraft both structurally and in terms of the performance envelope.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|