Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2010, 05:11 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
Actually the Imperial Japanese arsenal is lacking across the board.

No Army attack planes, several important fighters not there, No IJN cruisers at all. On and on.
Well, yes. Model planes that actually took part in the war first...

But before you do anything else, TD, I WANNA WALRUS!:


As I've said before, if TD only ever give us planes I've never heard of before, I'll still fly them. If you want something specific, I'd try to make a better case for it than 'X or Y should be included'.
  #2  
Old 06-05-2010, 05:13 AM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

The Walrus is reserved for SoW.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
  #3  
Old 06-05-2010, 05:27 AM
bf-110's Avatar
bf-110 bf-110 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SP,Brasil
Posts: 465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
The Walrus is reserved for SoW.
Is it too?


Indeed,there are still some planes lacking for Pacific Theater,like G3M,Ki-67,D4Y...and no,I´m not meaning TD work till now is useless.
  #4  
Old 06-05-2010, 05:52 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Smile

Quote:
The Walrus is reserved for SoW.


I wasn't being entirely serious, ElAurens, though I'd like to fly this ugly duckling sometime - if it ever gets into SoW I'll be happy enough. I found one on MSFS once, but it was a pile of poop regarding flight modelling, and didn't look too good either - no 3d cockpit, from what I remember.

I think it should be remembered as an example to aircraft designers. Geoffrey De Havilland proved that producing beautiful, useful aircraft was possible, but R.J Mitchell proved that you could do without the beauty, when necessary...
  #5  
Old 06-05-2010, 02:12 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Mr. West,

I too dearly want to fly the Walrus. Flying boats are my favorite subtype of aircraft, bar none. I wish there was a flyable in the stock side of the sim. The H8K "Emily" external model is begging for a cockpit. It would be a dream come true.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
  #6  
Old 06-06-2010, 09:17 AM
bigbossmalone bigbossmalone is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 109
Default padlocking ships?

Hi TD guys
I have a hopefully simple request for 4.10 or any future official patch. it's a request i've been making on and off over the last few years - i was hoping the arrival of mods would solve this issue for me, but it seems not. so, i think going the official route is still the best option.
would it be possible to allow padlocking of ships? it seems silly that you can padlock planes, ground vehicles and AA of all sorts, but when flying over the ocean with nothing else around, you cannot padlock, for instance, a carrier that you are in a landing pattern for.
i don't know how much work it is, but logic tells me it shouldn't really be that hard to implement. anyway, thanks for listening - i sincerely hope you guys could address this in the future.
regards
Malone
  #7  
Old 06-06-2010, 02:11 PM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

'Padlock external ground targets', or whatever it is called, already works for ships - you'll need to use the 'friendly' one for your carrier, though if you fly a sensible approach pattern you should ideally keep it in view anyway.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.