Daidalos Team's Room -QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS ONLY on IL2 Authorized Addons

[Billfish]

So does DT have any questions regarding the information posted below or the Ki-61 or even Ki-43 that I can help answer?

K2

Originally Posted by Billfish

The thread below has been updated with more points as to the Ki-61 (with some overflow of similar things to Ki-43)......More coming.

http://78sentai.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=401

K2

[TheGrunch]

Could you guys make it so that it's impossible to use smaller increments of flaps with them set on an axis in aircraft with two-position flaps like the Spitfire and Hurricane?

[Xilon_x]

i want to respond to nearmiss.I think peoples request much airplane because not satisfied.
Il-2 sturmovik 1946 have a long list and good list of WW2 airplane.initially when the first il-2 came out had all list RUSSIAN airplane BOMBERS-FIGHTERS-RECONNAISSANCES-SEAPLANE-GLIDERS-JET i loock in the bock all list RUSSIAN plane and compare whit IL-2 sturmovik list and i conclude that
Russian aircraft are almost all missing 2 or 3 RUSSIAN bombers and jet plane.
GERMAN have good list but not complete
ENGLAND not have the important BOMBERS and fighters.
FRANCE not have airplane only 1 but only AI
ITALY have good list but missing all bombers and some fighter and seaplane.
U.S.A. good list but missing some bombers and reconnaissances airplane.
JAPAN missing airplane ecc. ec. all nation
now the PRIORITY is the FRANCE because france not have 1 fighter flyiable.

i THINK now actualy il-2 have a good list i not remember but now list is 270 type of airplane of all nation.for complete list MISSING about 130 type of airplane and 20 type of prototype and luft46.
LUFT 46 list and secret airplane was a good idea in past time to insert in il-2 sturmovik.BUT i REMEMBER the name of programm is IL_2 sturmovik and not WW2 SIMULATOR.

[nearmiss]

Sorry, not buying your music. We finally have someone that actually has the programming ability and desire to fix alot of problems within the actual core of the IL2.

The IL2 code is open now and building aircraft,etc. is nothing like coding the core programming. It's like asking highly skilled person to wash cars for a living.

There are sites where you can request the kind of stuff you want. If we get new aircraft from TD I'm OK with it, otherwise no way I request them.

We've been reading new aircraft whine threads for 10 years and now we have someone really working to do major improvements and the whines persist.

[Xilon_x]

ok ok nearmis i am agree not new airplane but fixing actual airplane and physics .

in mission builder if i put the gray runway ad after clik fly if i go to te border of runway airplane explode in fact, the airplane would just go down the step and damaged a bit 'to the laws of physics should not explode.

when the plane taxis on the ground it bounces a little too much dirt

these strong rebound on the ground give the impression that the airplane does not have a specific weight.
when the plane taxis on the runway is good.

if i put black runway and i go to the border of the runway the airplane jumping like a spring, and after falling explodes.should move a little bad but not jump.

not real physic.

[nearmiss]

Now you're talking...

We need to fix things that require code changes within the core programming.

[Red Dragon-DK]

Originally Posted by TheGrunch

Could you guys make it so that it's impossible to use smaller increments of flaps with them set on an axis in aircraft with two-position flaps like the Spitfire and Hurricane?

Why do you want that?????

[TheGrunch]

Originally Posted by Red Dragon-DK

Why do you want that?????

Because it's unrealistic to be able to use flaps in anything other than the up or down position in those aircraft.

[Bulgarian]

Originally Posted by TheGrunch

Could you guys make it so that it's impossible to use smaller increments of flaps with them set on an axis in aircraft with two-position flaps like the Spitfire and Hurricane?

Hello Grunch,
can you rephrase yourself,because it's hard to understand what you're exactly trying to say.

[David603]

Originally Posted by Bulgarian

Hello Grunch,
can you rephrase yourself,because it's hard to understand what you're exactly trying to say.

I believe Grunch means that at the moment, it is possible to set the Flaps to be controlled by a slider or analogue switch, like the throttle. This means you can set the flaps to be at any position from fully extended to fully retracted. On planes that don't have combat settings for their flaps like the Spitfire and Hurricane, this allows you to put the flaps down only part way, where they act like the combat setting for flaps, and this gives players using this technique an advantage these planes would not have historically.