Daidalos Team's Room -QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS ONLY on IL2 Authorized Addons

[Lucas_From_Hell]

Alien, I think this is already being made. I don't remember the exact nickname, but I do remember that there was someone with something (what an exact description, don't you thin? ) related to "AI" on the signature.

Sorry for my poor memory, I suck with names...

But, well, I hope we get some improvements on the AI, for sure.

[II./JG1_Klaiber]

My apologies if this has been mentioned previously within this thread -it's long so I haven't had the chance to read everything- but would Team Daidalos consider including the Henschel Hs 123?

While only 39 were operational in 1939, it was the Energizer Bunny of the Luftwaffe. They tried to retire it over and over and over again, but they kept pulling it back into service because it was extremely good at what it did.

They even tried to start manufacturing it again in 1943 which is really saying something...

Just food for thought.

[Wildnoob]

Well, I haven't exposed argumentation previosly.

As for myself I think we need this plane.

It was the mainstay of the IJA for early and mid war and was used until the end.

The IJA doesn't have any attack aircraft in the sim, only figthers. And it's really a shame we have to use the G4M in army online missions.

Please team Daidalus, try considerate give the IJA this bomber. It's a very noble task you gonna be doing by finally giving the army their own attack plane.

I know people are asking for endless stuff, but I think you should considerate this request before definitely let this force without any significant bomber and thefore attack aircraft.

[uberGeezer]

Originally Posted by Wildnoob

Well, I haven't exposed argumentation previosly.

As for myself I think we need this plane.

It was the mainstay of the IJA for early and mid war and was used until the end.

The IJA doesn't have any attack aircraft in the sim, only figthers. And it's really a shame we have to use the G4M in army online missions.

Please team Daidalus, try considerate give the IJA this bomber. It's a very noble task you gonna be doing by finally giving the army their own attack plane.

I know people are asking for endless stuff, but I think you should considerate this request before definitely let this force without any significant bomber and thefore attack aircraft.

I may be able to fix this "problem". I have been learning how to make models in 3dsMax for a couple of years, and needed a theme for the stuff that I worked on. Because I have always loved the open cockpits and wheelspats of the 1930s, I chose the Japanese-China war because of the many different types of aircraft used. Shots below of WIPs - none are finished, but a few are close to completion. I will add the Ki.21 to my list, but it will be some time before I release anything.

[David603]

Originally Posted by uberGeezer

I may be able to fix this "problem". I have been learning how to make models in 3dsMax for a couple of years, and needed a theme for the stuff that I worked on. Because I have always loved the open cockpits and wheelspats of the 1930s, I chose the Japanese-China war because of the many different types of aircraft used. Shots below of WIPs - none are finished, but a few are close to completion. I will add the Ki.21 to my list, but it will be some time before I release anything.

Wow. How long have you been keeping this lot under wraps? Really can't wait for these aircraft, it looks like you have announced out of "nowhere" the fulfilment of a major proportion of my 1930s aircraft wish list, and not only will these aircraft be fantastic for the fascinating but so far ignored Japanese-China war but also a number of them for the Spanish Civil war, where we currently have many of the Republican aircraft but none of the Nationalist aircraft.

What's the twin engined Biplane in the right centre of the lower image? Not a reflection on your modelling skills, which are clearly superb but I thought I knew my 1930s aircraft and I don't recognise this one.

In what form are you thinking about releasing about these aircraft? IE via Daidalus Team in an official patch, or one of the mod sites? Either way, I will be looking forward to the completion of this project with much anticipation.

[uberGeezer]

Originally Posted by David603

Wow. How long have you been keeping this lot under wraps? Really can't wait for these aircraft, it looks like you have announced out of "nowhere" the fulfilment of a major proportion of my 1930s aircraft wish list, and not only will these aircraft be fantastic for the fascinating but so far ignored Japanese-China war but also a number of them for the Spanish Civil war, where we currently have many of the Republican aircraft but none of the Nationalist aircraft.

What's the twin engined Biplane in the right centre of the lower image? Not a reflection on your modelling skills, which are clearly superb but I thought I knew my 1930s aircraft and I don't recognise this one.

In what form are you thinking about releasing about these aircraft? IE via Daidalus Team in an official patch, or one of the mod sites? Either way, I will be looking forward to the completion of this project with much anticipation.

I started teaching myself how to make 3D models about 3 years ago, and only got good at it about 18 months ago - I've been working on the 1930s stuff since then. Still a lot to learn, so don't expect any releases anytime soon - unless Daedilus is interested. That would speed things up considerably.

The large twin-engined biplane WIP is the Curtiss Condor, which China used in modest numbers as a transport/bomber. My next project is a FIAT CR.32 - used by the Chinese in small numbers. Then, the export version of the P-26, also used in small numbers by the Chinese.

[mkubani]

Hello uberGeezer,

If you are serious in your 3D modelling for IL-2 and want to stick to the official IL-2 tech specifications in terms of polycount, LODs, textures, material setup, internal parts, etc. contact us at daidalos.team@gmail.com

We can take a look at one of your models and give you our best feedback if you are heading the right direction. If you make a historical plane completely and within proper technical guidelines, we will insert it into the game, program its FM and release it in our future work. No strings attached.

[Sita]

Originally Posted by uberGeezer

I may be able to fix this "problem". I have been learning how to make models in 3dsMax for a couple of years, and needed a theme for the stuff that I worked on. Because I have always loved the open cockpits and wheelspats of the 1930s, I chose the Japanese-China war because of the many different types of aircraft used. Shots below of WIPs - none are finished, but a few are close to completion. I will add the Ki.21 to my list, but it will be some time before I release anything.

OMG!!!
O_o!!!

[Insuber]

My request regards the Breda SAFAT 12.7 guns; I believe there is a large consensus that they are way too weak. In particular the belting is definitely wrong, as it doesn't include at all the incendiary rounds. The following thread explains the issue.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=2845

Just a quote from a post of uf_josse:

"... Believe me or not, but i think not the right place to expose code of the game....

But, belting is AP /HET (with explosion radius of 4 cm, instead 15 for the US m.2 with similar power) and APT

No API, no APIT.... era pictures show clearly API and APIT in belt with a more probable belting with API/APIT/HET.... (what i have done).

So, clealy undermodeled..... ".

The belting correction (and the correction of the radius of damage as well) would re-equilibrate the early war scenarios and add more interest to the dogfights.

Thank you,
Insuber

[LesniHU]

Originally Posted by Insuber

My request regards the Breda SAFAT 12.7 guns; I believe there is a large consensus that they are way too weak. In particular the belting is definitely wrong, as it doesn't include at all the incendiary rounds. The following thread explains the issue.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=2845

Just a quote from a post of uf_josse:

"... Believe me or not, but i think not the right place to expose code of the game....

But, belting is AP /HET (with explosion radius of 4 cm, instead 15 for the US m.2 with similar power) and APT

No API, no APIT.... era pictures show clearly API and APIT in belt with a more probable belting with API/APIT/HET.... (what i have done).

So, clealy undermodeled..... ".

The belting correction (and the correction of the radius of damage as well) would re-equilibrate the early war scenarios and add more interest to the dogfights.

Thank you,
Insuber

Unfortunately uf_josse didn't mention that NO belt in game uses API bullets, game handles fires through other means. Inserting API would make unpredictable effects including but not limited to throwing off relative gun performance and no such change will be done without prior research and correction of all belts in game.

Regarding SAFAT too weak, I think a table in post #5 in thread you linked explains it.